Transnational Litigation in U.S. Courts: A Theoretical and Empirical Reassessment

19 JOURNAL OF EMPIRICAL LEGAL STUDIES 4 (2022)

UC Irvine School of Law Research Paper No. 2022-10

57 Pages Posted: 1 Mar 2022

See all articles by Christopher A. Whytock

Christopher A. Whytock

University of California, Irvine, School of Law

Date Written: March 1, 2022

Abstract

It is widely claimed that the level of transnational litigation in U.S. courts is high and increasing, primarily due to forum shopping by foreign plaintiffs. This “transnational forum shopping claim” reflects the conventional wisdom among transnational litigation scholars. Lawyers use the claim in briefs; judges use it in court opinions; and interest groups use it to promote law reform.

This article reassesses the transnational forum shopping claim theoretically and empirically. It argues that despite globalization, there are reasons to doubt the claim. Changes in procedural and substantive law have made the U.S. legal system less attractive to plaintiffs than it supposedly once was. Meanwhile, other legal systems have been adopting features similar to those that are said to have made the United States a “magnet forum” for foreign plaintiffs, and arbitration is growing as an alternative to transnational litigation. Empirically, using data on approximately 8 million civil actions filed in the U.S. district courts since 1988, the article shows that transnational diversity cases represent only a small portion of overall litigation, their level has decreased overall, and U.S., not foreign, plaintiffs file most of them. The data also reveal that federal question filings by foreign resident plaintiffs are not extensive or increasing either.

These findings challenge the transnational forum shopping claim and law reforms based on it, and suggest that it should no longer be used by lawyers, judges, and scholars. The article’s analysis also suggests new directions for transnational litigation as a field of scholarship that would move it beyond its current focus on U.S. courts toward a focus on understanding the dynamics of transnational litigation in global context.

Keywords: Transnational Litigation, International Litigation, Litigation, Transnational Forum Shopping, International Forum Shopping, Forum Shopping, Federal Courts, Courts, Transnational Law, International Law, Comparative Law, Civil Procedure, Empirical Legal Studies, Globalization

Suggested Citation

Whytock, Christopher A., Transnational Litigation in U.S. Courts: A Theoretical and Empirical Reassessment (March 1, 2022). 19 JOURNAL OF EMPIRICAL LEGAL STUDIES 4 (2022), UC Irvine School of Law Research Paper No. 2022-10, Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=4046224

Christopher A. Whytock (Contact Author)

University of California, Irvine, School of Law ( email )

401 East Peltason Drive, Suite 1000
Irvine, CA 92697-8000
United States
(949) 824-0496 (Phone)

HOME PAGE: http://www.law.uci.edu

Do you have a job opening that you would like to promote on SSRN?

Paper statistics

Downloads
156
Abstract Views
624
rank
273,018
PlumX Metrics