Banks Incentive Pay, Diversification and Systemic Risk

56 Pages Posted: 28 Mar 2022 Last revised: 30 Jan 2025

See all articles by Fabio Castiglionesi

Fabio Castiglionesi

Tilburg University - Department of Finance

Shuo Zhao

Erasmus University Rotterdam (EUR) - Erasmus School of Economics (ESE)

Date Written: July 15, 2023

Abstract

This paper analyzes the impact of incentive pay for bank managers on financial stability. The study focuses on two banks owned by risk-neutral principals but operated by risk-averse managers who decide on leverage and the extent of diversification into the other bank’s assets, both of which determine the systemic risk. To begin, we establish the optimal incentive pay contract assuming a planner seeks to maximize the total value of the banks. In equilibrium, we find that the contract excessively relies on relative performance evaluation, leading to an inefficiently high degree of diversification, leverage, and systemic risk. This outcome obtains even when the principal represents the interests of all stakeholders in an individual bank. We demonstrate that only regulation specifically targeting relative performance evaluation can restore efficiency, while existing regulations on managerial pay can inadvertently amplify systemic risk.

Keywords: Absolute and relative performance evaluation, Correlated investment, Diversification, Systemic risk

JEL Classification: G21, G28, G32, M52

Suggested Citation

Castiglionesi, Fabio and Zhao, Shuo, Banks Incentive Pay, Diversification and Systemic Risk (July 15, 2023). Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=4048456 or http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.4048456

Fabio Castiglionesi

Tilburg University - Department of Finance ( email )

P.O. Box 90153
Tilburg, 5000 LE
Netherlands

Shuo Zhao (Contact Author)

Erasmus University Rotterdam (EUR) - Erasmus School of Economics (ESE) ( email )

Burgemeester Oudlaan 50
Rotterdam, 3062 PA
Netherlands

Do you have a job opening that you would like to promote on SSRN?

Paper statistics

Downloads
179
Abstract Views
720
Rank
356,895
PlumX Metrics