Due Process and the Right to an Individualized Hearing
UC Irvine Law Review (2023 Forthcoming)
University of Toledo Legal Studies Research Paper Forthcoming
69 Pages Posted: 8 Mar 2022 Last revised: 24 Dec 2022
Date Written: March 4, 2022
Due process requires the government to provide notice and a hearing before depriving individuals of protected rights. This right—the right to an individualized hearing—is powerful. It gives individuals the ability to know why the government is taking action that affects them; and it lets them oppose the government’s plans, often by presenting facts and arguments to a neutral decision-maker. As a result, the right to an individualized hearing can help shape the government’s substantive aims—and it even can prevent the government from acting all. But, despite its importance, there is a longstanding exception to the right to an individualized hearing. Individualized procedures are not required when the government acts on more than a few people at the same time. Although the right to an individualized hearing, and its exception, are fundamental to due process doctrine, scholars disagree about its origin and courts have struggled to delineate its contours.
This Article offers a new explanation for the scope of the right to an individualized hearing: it is a living relic of the once-pervasive “class legislation” doctrine. At one time, class legislation doctrine was a robust constitutional mechanism that courts used to prevent both the elevation of one “class” of society at the expense of another and arbitrary distinctions between groups. Accordingly, class legislation doctrine helped courts enforce the key rule of law value of generality. Although class legislation doctrine has faded from its prominent place in constitutional law, shades of it survive in the right to an individualized hearing. Indeed, courts sorting out the contours of the right to an individualized hearing often invoke class legislation standards and concepts that have been otherwise discarded from other areas of the law. Reconnecting the right to an individualized hearing with its class legislation origin sheds light on this mysterious but fundamental corner of due process doctrine. It also can help courts apply the right to an individualized hearing in ways that emphasize its crucial role in protecting the rule of law.
Keywords: Procedural Due Process, Due Process Clause, Administrative Law, Constitutional Theory, Class Legislation
Suggested Citation: Suggested Citation