WHO's First Scientific Review of Medicinal Cannabis: From Global Struggle to Patient Implications

Riboulet-Zemouli, K. and Krawitz, M.A. (2022), 'WHO’s first scientific review of medicinal Cannabis: from global struggle to patient implications', Drugs, Habits and Social Policy, 23(1): 5-21. DOI: 10.1108/DHS-11-2021-0060

24 Pages Posted: 25 Mar 2022 Last revised: 12 Aug 2022

See all articles by Kenzi Riboulet-Zemouli

Kenzi Riboulet-Zemouli

European Union Traditional Cannabis Medicines (EUTC) Research; FAAAT think & do tank

Michael A. Krawitz

Independent

Date Written: March 15, 2022

Abstract

Background: “Cannabis” and “cannabis resin” are derived from the Cannabis plant, used as herbal medications, in traditional medicine and as active pharmaceutical ingredients. Since 1961, they have been listed in Schedule IV, the most restrictive category of the single convention on narcotic drugs. The process to scientifically review and reschedule them was launched by the World Health Organisation (WHO) on 2 December 2016; it survived a number of hindrances until finally being submitted to a delayed and sui generis vote by the UN Commission on Narcotic Drugs on 2 December 2020, withdrawing “cannabis” and “cannabis resin” from Schedule IV.

Design/methodology/approach: To evaluate WHO’s scheduling recommendations, the process leading to the Commission vote and subsequent implications at global, national and patient/clinician levels. Narrative account of the four-year proceedings; review of the practical implications of both rejected and accepted recommendations.

Findings: The process was historically unprecedented, of political relevance to both medical Cannabis and evidence-based scheduling generally. Procedural barriers hampered the appropriate involvement of civil society stakeholders. The landscape resulting from accepted and rejected recommendations allows countries to continue creating decentralised, non-uniform systems for access to and availability of “cannabis” and “cannabis resin” for medical purposes.

Originality/value: Perspective of accredited observers; highlight of institutional issues and the lay of the land; contrast of stakeholders’ interpretations and engagement.

Note:
Funding Information: This research received support via open-ended donations to the non-profits FAAAT (France) and UDRCNet Foundation (US).

Declaration of Interests: The authors declare that they have no known competing financial interests or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this paper.

Keywords: cannabis, medical marijuana, cannabidiol, scheduling, United Nations, Commission on Narcotic Drugs, World Health Organization, Drug control, Single Convention on narcotic drugs, Convention on psychotropic substances

Suggested Citation

Riboulet-Zemouli, Kenzi and Krawitz, Michael A., WHO's First Scientific Review of Medicinal Cannabis: From Global Struggle to Patient Implications (March 15, 2022). Riboulet-Zemouli, K. and Krawitz, M.A. (2022), 'WHO’s first scientific review of medicinal Cannabis: from global struggle to patient implications', Drugs, Habits and Social Policy, 23(1): 5-21. DOI: 10.1108/DHS-11-2021-0060, Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=4055389 or http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.4055389

Kenzi Riboulet-Zemouli (Contact Author)

European Union Traditional Cannabis Medicines (EUTC) Research ( email )

FAAAT think & do tank ( email )

Rue Vitruve
Paris, 75020
France

HOME PAGE: http://https://kenzi.zemou.li

Michael A. Krawitz

Independent ( email )

Do you have a job opening that you would like to promote on SSRN?

Paper statistics

Downloads
289
Abstract Views
1,024
Rank
225,034
PlumX Metrics