Spatial Selection of Features within Perceived and Remembered Objects

9 Pages Posted: 18 Apr 2022

See all articles by Duncan E. Astle

Duncan E. Astle

University of Cambridge - MRC Cognition and Brain Sciences Unit

Gaia Scerif

University of Oxford

Bo-Cheng Kuo

University of Oxford

Anna C Nobre

Yale University; University of Oxford

Date Written: April 01, 2009

Abstract

Our representation of the visual world can be modulated by spatially specific attentional biases that depend flexibly on task goals. We compared searching for task-relevant features in perceived versus remembered objects. When searching perceptual input, selected task-relevant and suppressed task-irrelevant features elicited contrasting spatiotopic ERP effects, despite them being perceptually identical. This was also true when participants searched a memory array, suggesting that memory had retained the spatial organization of the original perceptual input and that this representation could be modulated in a spatially specific fashion. However, task-relevant selection and task-irrelevant suppression effects were of the opposite polarity when searching remembered compared to perceived objects. We suggest that this surprising result stems from the nature of feature- and object-based representations when stored in visual short-term memory. When stored, features are integrated into objects, meaning that the spatially specific selection mechanisms must operate upon objects rather than specific feature-level representations.

Note:
Funding Information: D.E.A. is supported by a post-doctoral fellowship from the Economic and Social Research Council, UK. D.E.A. and G.S. are supported by a project grant from the John Fell fund (Oxford University Press). G.S. and A.C.N. are both supported by project grants from the Wellcome Trust. B-C.K. was supported by a Scholarship from the National Science Council of Taiwan.

Declaration of Interests: The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.

Ethics Approval Statement: Each participant provided written informed consent. The study was approved by the medical ethics review board at the University of Oxford, UK.

Keywords: ERPs; electrophysiology; spatial attention; task-set control; visual short-term memory; working memory

Suggested Citation

Astle, Duncan E. and Scerif, Gaia and Kuo, Bo-Cheng and Nobre, Anna C, Spatial Selection of Features within Perceived and Remembered Objects (April 01, 2009). Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=4058162 or http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.4058162

Duncan E. Astle

University of Cambridge - MRC Cognition and Brain Sciences Unit ( email )

15 Chaucer Road
Cambridge, CB2 7EF
United Kingdom

Gaia Scerif

University of Oxford

Mansfield Road
Oxford, Oxfordshire OX1 4AU
United Kingdom

Bo-Cheng Kuo

University of Oxford

Mansfield Road
Oxford, Oxfordshire OX1 4AU
United Kingdom

Anna C Nobre (Contact Author)

Yale University ( email )

493 College St
New Haven, CT CT 06520
United States

HOME PAGE: http://brainandcognition.org/

University of Oxford ( email )

Wu Tsai Institute and Psychology Department
Yale University
New Haven, CT 06510
United States

HOME PAGE: http://brainandcognition.org/

Do you have negative results from your research you’d like to share?

Paper statistics

Downloads
14
Abstract Views
97
PlumX Metrics