In it for the Money? Academic Publishing, Open Access and the Authors’ Claim to Self-Determination in Private International Law

71 (2022) GRUR International - Journal of international and European IP Law 1034-1047.

14 Pages Posted: 6 Apr 2022 Last revised: 30 May 2024

See all articles by Guido Westkamp

Guido Westkamp

Queen Mary Intellectual Property Research Institute (QMIPRI); Queen Mary University of London - Centre for Commercial Law Studies (CCLS); University of Münster - Institute for Information, Telecommunication and Media Law

Date Written: March 18, 2022

Abstract

Open access research platforms are increasingly becoming the target of academic publishers claiming copyright infringement. Applicable law considerations are pivotal in such circumstances. The law governing the initial publishing agreement decides, ultimately, the extent to which rights have been transferred and the degree to which courts can exercise judicial control. Academic publishing differ significantly from standard copyright contracts. Academic authors remain customarily unremunerated and concurrently are expected to transfer all rights on an exclusive basis. Exclusivity thus eradicates the proliferation of open access platforms altogether. The article discusses the most relevant concerns that arise in private international contract law under the Rome I-Regulation as a matter of material justice. German substantive copyright contract law and the general principles affording protection to authors underpinning it, most importantly as regards the fundamental principle of equitable remuneration and its limits. The article dismisses the conventional approach as regards both contractual choices of law and the closest connection analysis and proposes, based on more subtle considerations of material justice as a relevant factor in modern EU private international, the application of special conflict rules so as to alleviate the problematic effects of uninhibited contractual freedom of contract, as a mechanism to avoid the designation of, particularly, a common law copyright jurisdiction imposed by way of predetermined terms governs the agreement. The article demonstrates, ultimately, that author’s claims to self-determination must outweigh the commercial interests of publishers, inadvertently providing open access platforms with legal certainty and freedom to republish.

Keywords: Academic publishing, Open access, Platform liability, Publishing agreements, Exclusivity, Copyright contract law, Private international law, Choice of law, Unfair terms, Material Justice

JEL Classification: Copyright Law, Private international law

Suggested Citation

Westkamp, Guido, In it for the Money? Academic Publishing, Open Access and the Authors’ Claim to Self-Determination in Private International Law (March 18, 2022). 71 (2022) GRUR International - Journal of international and European IP Law 1034-1047., Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=4060986 or http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.4060986

Guido Westkamp (Contact Author)

Queen Mary Intellectual Property Research Institute (QMIPRI) ( email )

67-69 Lincoln's Inn Fields
London, WC1A 3JB
United Kingdom

HOME PAGE: http://www.law.qmul.ac.uk/staff/westkamp.html

Queen Mary University of London - Centre for Commercial Law Studies (CCLS) ( email )

London, WC1A 3JB
United Kingdom

University of Münster - Institute for Information, Telecommunication and Media Law ( email )

Germany

Do you have a job opening that you would like to promote on SSRN?

Paper statistics

Downloads
102
Abstract Views
778
Rank
576,425
PlumX Metrics