Nondelegation Limits on COVID Emergency Powers: Lessons from the Eviction Moratorium and Title 42 Cases

42 Pages Posted: 25 Mar 2022 Last revised: 7 Jul 2022

See all articles by Ilya Somin

Ilya Somin

George Mason University - Antonin Scalia Law School

Date Written: March 24, 2022

Abstract

Two legal battles over COVID pandemic emergency measures highlight the dangers of excessive delegation of emergency power to executive branch agencies: the recently concluded litigation over the Centers for Disease Control nationwide eviction moratorium, and the still-ongoing legal battle over that same agency’s Title 42 “public health” expulsions of immigrants. While superficially different, the two legal battles actually raise very similar issues. Both involve exercises of power by the exact same federal agency, utilizing authority it claims was delegated to it under consecutive provisions of the Public Health Service Act of 1944. Both measures were first adopted under the Trump Administration, and later continued—with some modifications—under the Biden Administration. The bipartisan nature of the policies suggests that the problems they raise are not limited to one party, nor to one side of the political spectrum.

Both policies were open to serious challenge under the constitutional nondelegation doctrine, and under the related “major question” doctrine. These vulnerabilities eventually led to the judicial invalidation of the eviction moratorium, and may have contributed to the DC Circuit’s partial invalidation of the Title 42 expulsions. Finally, it is notable that both policies caused great harm, while doing little to stop the spread of the disease; both were enacted by the executive despite skepticism from public health experts.

Part I of this article provides an overview of the eviction moratorium and Title 42 policies, and the resulting litigation. In Part II, I explain why both policies violate the constitutional nondelegation principles. Part III shows how, for very similar reasons, both also run afoul of the major question doctrine. Finally, Part IV outlines some lessons that can be gleaned from these cases. Among other things, they strengthen the case for nondeferential judicial review of emergency powers and delegations to supposedly expert executive agencies. They also highlight the need for greater cross-ideological cooperation and dialogue on these issues. Nondelegation and major question limits on emergency powers will be on firmer ground if they enjoy cross-ideological support and cannot be stigmatized as mere partisan tools of one side of the political spectrum.

Keywords: Public health, coronavirus, major question, nondelegation, separation of powers, immigration, migration, democracy, judicial review, property rights, constitutional theory, deference, Title 42, eviction moratorium, Biden, Trump, CDC, coronavirus, COVID-19, emergency powers

JEL Classification: F22, I11, I18, K33, K37, P14, P16, P48, R11

Suggested Citation

Somin, Ilya, Nondelegation Limits on COVID Emergency Powers: Lessons from the Eviction Moratorium and Title 42 Cases (March 24, 2022). New York University Journal of Law & Liberty, Vol. 15, pp. 658–698 (2022) (Symposium on “Responding to Emergency: A Blueprint for Liberty in A Time of Crisis”), George Mason Legal Studies Research Paper No. LS 22-17, Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=4065817 or http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.4065817

Ilya Somin (Contact Author)

George Mason University - Antonin Scalia Law School ( email )

3301 Fairfax Drive
Arlington, VA 22201
United States
703-993-8069 (Phone)
703-993-8124 (Fax)

HOME PAGE: http://sls.gmu.edu/ilya-somin/

Do you have a job opening that you would like to promote on SSRN?

Paper statistics

Downloads
277
Abstract Views
2,416
Rank
220,986
PlumX Metrics