Personal Precedent at the Supreme Court

46 Pages Posted: 28 Mar 2022 Last revised: 4 Apr 2022

See all articles by Richard M. Re

Richard M. Re

University of Virginia School of Law

Date Written: March 28, 2022

Abstract

Personal precedent is a judge’s presumptive adherence to her own previously expressed views of the law. This essay shows that personal precedent both does and should play a central role in Supreme Court practice. For example, personal precedent simultaneously underlies and cabins institutional precedent—as vividly illustrated in the now-pending abortion case Dobbs v. Jackson Women’s Health. Further, the justices’ use of personal precedent is largely inevitable, as well as beneficial in many cases. Still, the justices should manage or reform their use of personal precedent, including by limiting its creation. Finally, and most fundamentally, personal precedent challenges conventional theories of legality. Though typically excluded from the law, personal precedent may actually be its building block.

Keywords: precedent, stare decisis, positivism, Supreme Court, judicial decisionmaking

Suggested Citation

Re, Richard M., Personal Precedent at the Supreme Court (March 28, 2022). Harvard Law Review, Forthcoming, Virginia Public Law and Legal Theory Research Paper No. 2022-25, Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=4068518

Richard M. Re (Contact Author)

University of Virginia School of Law ( email )

580 Massie Road
Charlottesville, VA 22903
United States

Do you have a job opening that you would like to promote on SSRN?

Paper statistics

Downloads
974
Abstract Views
3,659
rank
35,095
PlumX Metrics