ESG Investing: A Tale of Two Preferences

75 Pages Posted: 27 Apr 2022 Last revised: 18 Mar 2023

See all articles by Paul Yoo

Paul Yoo

University of North Carolina (UNC) at Chapel Hill - Kenan-Flagler Business School

Date Written: March 28, 2022

Abstract

What motivates ESG integration? I find both non-pecuniary and risk-mitigating preferences explain its prominence. Using widely endorsed ESG ratings, I show each preference induces sizable ESG equity premium identified through option-implied expected returns. Due to unexpectedly persistent demand growth for ESG-conscious assets, realized returns mask true ESG pricing effects, especially those attributable to non-pecuniary preference. Consequently, this paper lends support to recent theoretical frameworks on ESG investing with non-pecuniary preference and reconciles mixed evidence in the empirical literature. In addition, I am able to identify the impact of investors’ hedging motives against negative non-pecuniary externalities via option-implied risk-neutral moments.

Keywords: Environmental, Social, Governance (ESG) investing, Non-pecuniary preference, ESG equity premia, Option-implied moments, Externalities.

JEL Classification: G11, G12, G13, G41, M14

Suggested Citation

Yoo, Paul, ESG Investing: A Tale of Two Preferences (March 28, 2022). Kenan Institute of Private Enterprise Research Paper No. 4069015, Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=4069015 or http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.4069015

Paul Yoo (Contact Author)

University of North Carolina (UNC) at Chapel Hill - Kenan-Flagler Business School ( email )

McColl Building
Chapel Hill, NC 27599-3490
United States

Do you have a job opening that you would like to promote on SSRN?

Paper statistics

Downloads
481
Abstract Views
3,236
Rank
92,295
PlumX Metrics