Response to UK IPO Open Consultation on Artificial Intelligence and Intellectual Property: Patents (Sept-Nov 2020)

2 Pages Posted: 4 May 2022

See all articles by John Liddicoat

John Liddicoat

King’s College London; University of Cambridge - Faculty of Law; University of Tasmania

James Parish

King's College London - The Dickson Poon School of Law

Date Written: November 30, 2020

Abstract

A comment on the idea of granting patents to AI as an inventor, assuming AI can pass the threshold of inventiveness required under patent law. The submission raises doubt that disclosure theory could justify awarding patents to AI, and calls on the UK IPO to look for empirical evidence that potential patentees are not investing in R&D of AI inventions.

Keywords: patents, artificial intelligence

Suggested Citation

Liddicoat, Johnathon and Parish, James, Response to UK IPO Open Consultation on Artificial Intelligence and Intellectual Property: Patents (Sept-Nov 2020) (November 30, 2020). Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=4070695 or http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.4070695

Johnathon Liddicoat (Contact Author)

King’s College London ( email )

Strand
London, England WC2R 2LS
United Kingdom

University of Cambridge - Faculty of Law ( email )

10 West Road
Cambridge, CB3 9DZ
United Kingdom

University of Tasmania ( email )

French Street
Sandy Bay
Hobart, Tasmania 7001
Australia

James Parish

King's College London - The Dickson Poon School of Law ( email )

Somerset House East Wing
Strand
London, WC2R 2LS
United Kingdom

Do you have a job opening that you would like to promote on SSRN?

Paper statistics

Downloads
106
Abstract Views
449
Rank
516,797
PlumX Metrics