Understanding the Bitterness of Wassily Leontief: Intention and Reception of Input-Output Techniques, 1940s-1950s

Center for the History of Political Economy at Duke University Working Paper Series (2022).

39 Pages Posted: 4 May 2022

See all articles by Vincent Carret

Vincent Carret

Heider College of Business, Creighton University

Date Written: March 30, 2022

Abstract

Leontief was and still is one of the most recognized names in economics, inextricably linked to the development of input-output techniques, but throughout his life he remained fiercely critical of other economists’ works and of the state of economic science. To understand his bitterness, we go back to the root of the split between Leontief and the rest of the economics profession, through an examination based on new archival material of the debates that took place in the late 1940s. We show that these debates were concerned with the core of the practice of economists, the conduct of economic policy and the relation between rational individuals and the economy as a whole. From his input-output model, conceived as an operational theory of economic interdependencies, Leontief drew a specific approach to economic policy and planning which had a lot of success with government agencies, explaining how he could durably sustain his split from the profession.

Suggested Citation

Carret, Vincent, Understanding the Bitterness of Wassily Leontief: Intention and Reception of Input-Output Techniques, 1940s-1950s (March 30, 2022). Center for the History of Political Economy at Duke University Working Paper Series (2022)., Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=4070884 or http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.4070884

Vincent Carret (Contact Author)

Heider College of Business, Creighton University ( email )

2500 California St.
Omaha, NE 68178
United States

Do you have a job opening that you would like to promote on SSRN?

Paper statistics

Downloads
132
Abstract Views
420
Rank
402,400
PlumX Metrics