COVID-19 Differentiated Measures for Unvaccinated Individuals: The Need for Clear Goals and Strong Justifications

17 Pages Posted: 1 Apr 2022

See all articles by Teck Chuan Voo

Teck Chuan Voo

affiliation not provided to SSRN

Julian Savulescu

University of Oxford - Uehiro Centre for Practical Ethics

G.O Schaefer

National University of Singapore (NUS)

Abel Zhi Ling Ho

affiliation not provided to SSRN

Clarence C. Tam

National University of Singapore (NUS) - Saw Swee Hock School of Public Health; London School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine - Department of Infectious Disease and Epidemiology

Abstract

Numerous countries and jurisdictions have implemented differential COVID-19 public health restrictions based on individual vaccination status to mitigate the public health risks posed by unvaccinated individuals. Although it is scientifically and ethically justifiable to introduce such vaccination-based differentiated measures as a risk-based approach to resume high-risk activities in an ongoing pandemic, their justification is weakened by lack of clarity on their intended goals and the specific risks or potential harms they intend to mitigate. Furthermore, the criteria for the removal of differentiated measures may not be clear, which raises the possibility of shifting goalposts without clear justification and with potential for unfairly discriminatory consequences. This paper seeks to clarify the ethical justification of COVID-19 vaccination-based differentiated measures based on a public health risk-based approach, with focus on their deployment in domestic settings. We argue that such measures should be consistent with the principal goal of COVID-19 vaccination programmes, which is to reduce the incidence of severely ill patients and associated healthcare burdens so as to protect a health system. We provide some considerations for the removal of vaccination-based differentiated measures based on this goal.

Note:
Funding Information: JS received funding in the form of grants from Wellcome Trust (WT104848/Z/14/Z and WT203132/Z/16/Z) and the UK Arts and Humanities Research Council (AH/V013947/1). JS, through his involvement with the Murdoch Children’s Research Institute, received funding from the Victorian State Government through the Operational Infrastructure Support (OIS) Program.

Conflict of Interests: TCV, OS, AHZL and CCT declare they have no competing interests. JS is a Partner Investigator on an Australian Research Council grant LP190100841 which involves industry partnership from Illumina. He does not personally receive any funds from Illumina. JS is a Bioethics Committee consultant for Bayer.

Keywords: COVID-19, pandemic, public health restrictions, ethics, vaccination

Suggested Citation

Voo, Teck Chuan and Savulescu, Julian and Schaefer, G.O and Ho, Abel Zhi Ling and Tam, Clarence C., COVID-19 Differentiated Measures for Unvaccinated Individuals: The Need for Clear Goals and Strong Justifications. Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=4072624

Teck Chuan Voo

affiliation not provided to SSRN ( email )

No Address Available

Julian Savulescu

University of Oxford - Uehiro Centre for Practical Ethics ( email )

10 Merton Street
Oxford OX1 3JP
United Kingdom
+44 1865 276926 (Phone)
+44 1865 276932 (Fax)

HOME PAGE: http://www.practicalethics.ox.ac.uk/juliansavulescu.html

G.O Schaefer

National University of Singapore (NUS) ( email )

1E Kent Ridge Road
NUHS Tower Block Level 7
Singapore, 119228
Singapore

Abel Zhi Ling Ho

affiliation not provided to SSRN ( email )

No Address Available

Clarence C. Tam (Contact Author)

National University of Singapore (NUS) - Saw Swee Hock School of Public Health ( email )

16 Medical Drive
#10-01
117597
Singapore

London School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine - Department of Infectious Disease and Epidemiology ( email )

London
United Kingdom

Do you have a job opening that you would like to promote on SSRN?

Paper statistics

Downloads
24
Abstract Views
156
PlumX Metrics