Agency MBS as Safe Assets

57 Pages Posted: 4 Apr 2022 Last revised: 13 Mar 2025

See all articles by Zhiguo He

Zhiguo He

Stanford University - Knight Management Center

Zhaogang Song

Johns Hopkins University - Carey Business School

Date Written: April 2022

Abstract

Measured as yield spreads against AAA corporate bonds, the convenience premium for agency MBS averaged 47 basis points between 1995 and 2021, about half of the long-term-Treasury convenience premium. Both the MBS convenience premium and the issuance amount vary negatively with the mortgage rate, which is consistent with a prepayment-driven demand channel. This negative dependence contrasts strikingly with the positive dependence of the MBS-repo convenience premium on interest rates, as implied by the “opportunity cost of money” hypothesis. The placing of agencies into conservatorship in 2008 and the introduction of the liquidity coverage ratio in 2013 affected the convenience premium significantly, which is consistent with the safety and regulatory-constraint channels of demand for MBS. Based on “structural” restrictions in standard models, the ratio of MBS to Treasury convenience premia pinpoints the time-varying MBS-specific demand empirically.

Suggested Citation

He, Zhiguo and Song, Zhaogang, Agency MBS as Safe Assets (April 2022). NBER Working Paper No. w29899, Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=4074283

Zhiguo He (Contact Author)

Stanford University - Knight Management Center ( email )

655 Knight Way
Stanford, CA 94305-7298
United States

Zhaogang Song

Johns Hopkins University - Carey Business School ( email )

100 International Drive
Baltimore, MD 21202
United States

Do you have a job opening that you would like to promote on SSRN?

Paper statistics

Downloads
23
Abstract Views
406
PlumX Metrics