Improvements of Statistical Practices Were Strongly Needed Among Prognostic Prediction Models For Obstetric Care

15 Pages Posted: 13 Apr 2022

See all articles by Jing Tan

Jing Tan

Sichuan University - Chinese Evidence-Based Medicine Centre

Chunrong Liu

Sichuan University - Chinese Evidence-Based Medicine Centre

Min Yang

Sichuan University - Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics

Yiquan Xiong

Sichuan University - Chinese Evidence-Based Medicine Centre

Shiyao Huang

Sichuan University - Chinese Evidence-Based Medicine Centre

Yana Qi

Sichuan University - Chinese Evidence-Based Medicine Centre

Meng Chen

Sichuan University - Key Laboratory of Birth Defects and Related Diseases of Women and Children of Ministry of Education

Lehana Thabane

McMaster University - Department of Health Research Methods, Evidence, and Impact (HEI)

Xinghui Liu

Sichuan University - Key Laboratory of Birth Defects and Related Diseases of Women and Children of Ministry of Education

Xin Sun

Sichuan University - Chinese Evidence-Based Medicine Centre

Abstract

Objective: To investigate statistical practices among prognostic prediction models for obstetric care.

Study Design: We searched PubMed for studies reporting development or validation of prognostic prediction models for obstetric care published in a 10-year time span (2011-2021). Teams of investigators independently used structured, pilot-tested questionnaires to screen reports for eligibility and collect data.

Results: In total, 121 studies were eligible, including 111 reporting model development and 10 exclusively reporting external validation. In developing models, 58.6% of studies included no validation, and 35.1% conducted internal validation only. Stepwise approach (45.3%) and univariable significance test (24.5%) were frequently used for selecting predictors, and the vast majority (70.7%) simply applied p-value for the selection decision. Only 5.4% measured the correlation between predictors. Logistic regression (72.7%) was most frequently used for deriving model algorithm, and only 10.8% applied shrinkage techniques. In assessing model performance, most (81.1%) assessed model discrimination, but only 18.9% evaluated calibration.  In presenting model, 48.8% failed to present model algorithms, and 36.4% of models were recommended even without any validation. No significant differences were found in most statistical practices before and after the release of TRIPOD.

Conclusion: The statistical practices of prognostic prediction models for obstetric care were far from optimal.

Note:
Funding Information: This work was funded by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (72174132, 71974138), National Key Research and Development Program of China (2021YFC2701503), China Medical Board (CMB19-324), and Sichuan Youth Science and Technology Innovation Research Team (2020JDTD0015).

Conflict of Interests: None.

Keywords: Prognostic prediction model, Statistical analyses, Obstetric care

Suggested Citation

Tan, Jing and Liu, Chunrong and Yang, Min and Xiong, Yiquan and Huang, Shiyao and Qi, Yana and Chen, Meng and Thabane, Lehana and Liu, Xinghui and Sun, Xin, Improvements of Statistical Practices Were Strongly Needed Among Prognostic Prediction Models For Obstetric Care. Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=4083029 or http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.4083029

Jing Tan

Sichuan University - Chinese Evidence-Based Medicine Centre ( email )

Chunrong Liu

Sichuan University - Chinese Evidence-Based Medicine Centre ( email )

Min Yang

Sichuan University - Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics ( email )

Yiquan Xiong

Sichuan University - Chinese Evidence-Based Medicine Centre

Shiyao Huang

Sichuan University - Chinese Evidence-Based Medicine Centre ( email )

Yana Qi

Sichuan University - Chinese Evidence-Based Medicine Centre ( email )

Meng Chen

Sichuan University - Key Laboratory of Birth Defects and Related Diseases of Women and Children of Ministry of Education ( email )

Lehana Thabane

McMaster University - Department of Health Research Methods, Evidence, and Impact (HEI) ( email )

Hamilton, Ontario L8N 3Z5
Canada

Xinghui Liu

Sichuan University - Key Laboratory of Birth Defects and Related Diseases of Women and Children of Ministry of Education ( email )

Xin Sun (Contact Author)

Sichuan University - Chinese Evidence-Based Medicine Centre ( email )

Do you have a job opening that you would like to promote on SSRN?

Paper statistics

Downloads
42
Abstract Views
281
PlumX Metrics