A Critical Review of Hart’s Scathing Attack on Austin’S Command Theory

14 Pages Posted: 8 May 2022

See all articles by Muhammad Munir

Muhammad Munir

International Islamic University, Islamabad - Department of Law

Date Written: April 17, 2022

Abstract

Hart rebukes Austin’s command theory of law and does not consider it a legal theory. Hart’s intense criticism, especially in chapter two of his book The Concept of Law is too severe. This work explores Hart’s methodology in criticizing Austin’s theory. Whether Hart is justified in its vilification of the command theory? Whether Hart has rightly described the command theory as the gunman theory? Whether Hart has attacked Austin’s theory or has castigated things not said by Austin? Whether the command theory was really as bad as described by Hart or was Hart very unfair in his criticism of Austin? Whether Hart made mistakes while criticizing Austin? Can Austin be defended against Hart’s criticism? And, finally, how Hart got influenced by some of the concepts in Austin’s theory that he had criticized earlier.

Keywords: Hart, Austin, Jurisprudence, command, sanction, law, sovereign, gunman theory, orders backed by threats, coercive orders

Suggested Citation

Munir, Muhammad, A Critical Review of Hart’s Scathing Attack on Austin’S Command Theory (April 17, 2022). Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=4086029 or http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.4086029

Muhammad Munir (Contact Author)

International Islamic University, Islamabad - Department of Law ( email )

Islamabad, Islamabad Capital Territory 44,000
Pakistan
3335124423 (Phone)
0092-51-9258021 (Fax)

HOME PAGE: http://www.iiu.edu.pk

Do you have a job opening that you would like to promote on SSRN?

Paper statistics

Downloads
125
Abstract Views
269
rank
305,525
PlumX Metrics