Inequity Aversion in Tournaments
CIRPEE Working Paper 03-22
24 Pages Posted: 17 Jun 2003
Date Written: April 2003
Abstract
We consider the cost of providing incentives using tournaments when workers are inequity averse and performance evaluation is costly. The principal never benefits from empathy to align incentives in a moral hazard framework between the workers, but he may benefit from their propensity for envy depending on the costs of assessing performance. More envious employees are preferred when the costs are high, less envious ones when they are low.
Keywords: Tournaments, inequity aversion, envy, incentives, performance
JEL Classification: D8, J4
Suggested Citation: Suggested Citation
Do you have a job opening that you would like to promote on SSRN?
Recommended Papers
-
Moral Hazard and Other-Regarding Preferences
By Hideshi Itoh
-
Envy and Compassion in Tournaments
By Christian Grund and Dirk Sliwka
-
Contracts and Inequity Aversion
By Florian Englmaier and Achim Wambach
-
Optimal Incentive Contracts Under Inequity Aversion
By Florian Englmaier and Achim Wambach
-
The Intensity of Incentives in Firms and Markets: Moral Hazard With Envious Agents
-
Optimal Incentive Contracts for a Worker Who Envies His Boss
By Robert Dur and Amihai Glazer
-
Output and Wages with Inequality Averse Agents
By Dominique Demougin, Claude Fluet, ...
-
Optimal Contracts When Agents Envy Each Other
By Anjan V. Thakor and Anand M. Goel