Randomly Selected Representative Committees

27 Pages Posted: 30 Apr 2022

See all articles by Michael Hasday

Michael Hasday

Benjamin L. Crump College of Law at St. Thomas University

Josep E. Peris

Universidad de Alicante

Begoña Subiza

Universidad de Alicante

Multiple version iconThere are 2 versions of this paper

Abstract

There are many real-world examples where decisions are made by a committee rather than all of the members of a court, legislature, or other body. The members of such committees are usually chosen either using random selection or using direct selection by a designated authority. However, neither of these methods satisfies both of the lodestar principles that each member of the body has an equal opportunity of being selected to serve on each committee and that the collective view of each committee is representative of the collective view of all of the members of the body. We present a new committee selection method that has the core benefits of random selection (equal opportunity) and direct selection (the possibility of representativeness) while avoiding their pitfalls. This new method consists of creating a pool of “average” committees in which each member of the body serves on the same number of committees included in the pool, and then randomly selecting a committee from the pool.

Keywords: Representative Committee, Panel Assignment, Random Selection, Outlier Panel

Suggested Citation

Hasday, Michael and Peris, Josep E. and Subiza, Begoña, Randomly Selected Representative Committees. Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=4097523 or http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.4097523

Michael Hasday (Contact Author)

Benjamin L. Crump College of Law at St. Thomas University ( email )

16401 NW 37th Avenue
Miami, FL 33054
United States

Josep E. Peris

Universidad de Alicante ( email )

Begoña Subiza

Universidad de Alicante ( email )

0 References

    0 Citations

      Do you have a job opening that you would like to promote on SSRN?

      Paper statistics

      Downloads
      17
      Abstract Views
      310
      PlumX Metrics