More True Confessions of a Legal Writing Professor: Dictionaries Should Not Be a Democracy

__ Ariz. Att'y __ (Forthcoming 2022)

Arizona Legal Studies Discussion Paper No. 22-08

11 Pages Posted: 3 May 2022

See all articles by Diana Simon

Diana Simon

James E. Rogers College of Law, The University of Arizona

Date Written: April 30, 2022

Abstract

This, at times, irreverent, tongue-in-cheek article is about how dictionaries include words legal writers should not use in their writing, such as, irregardless, anyways, and judgement. First, the article addresses the word “irregardless” because law students frequently include that word (incorrectly) in their writing. Second, the article discusses how lexicographers decide to include words in dictionaries based on popular usage. Third, the article covers additional (incorrect) words that students write, such as “anyways” and “judgement.” Finally, the article concludes that, while legal writers should consult dictionaries, they should not view the words within them as the final arbiter for proper usage in legal writing, which has its own conventions.

Keywords: legal writing, legal education, dictionaries, irregardless, judgment and judgement, legal writers

Suggested Citation

Simon, Diana, More True Confessions of a Legal Writing Professor: Dictionaries Should Not Be a Democracy (April 30, 2022). __ Ariz. Att'y __ (Forthcoming 2022) , Arizona Legal Studies Discussion Paper No. 22-08, Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=4099172

Diana Simon (Contact Author)

James E. Rogers College of Law, The University of Arizona ( email )

P.O. Box 210176
Tucson, AZ 85721-0176
United States

Do you have a job opening that you would like to promote on SSRN?

Paper statistics

Downloads
54
Abstract Views
549
Rank
591,164
PlumX Metrics