Reducing Liquidity Mismatch in Open-Ended Funds: A Cost-Benefit Analysis

28 Pages Posted: 13 May 2022

Date Written: April 22, 2022

Abstract

Macroprudential authorities increasingly find themselves needing to assess, and act on, risks from outside the traditional banking system. How should they think about the costs and benefits of these actions? In this paper we present an approach to cost-benefit analysis for one topical issue related to non-banks – liquidity mismatch in open-ended funds (OEFs). In particular, we analyse the benefits and costs of more extensive use of swing pricing by UK corporate bond OEFs. Using several models, we quantify the impact of liquidity mismatch and swing pricing on corporate bond spreads and expected GDP growth. We estimate that greater use of swing pricing could reduce amplification of investment grade corporate bond spreads by around 8%, and improve the distribution of GDP growth. We discuss qualitatively the impact of swing pricing on fund liquidity buffers, and the possible costs of swing pricing. We conclude that there are likely to be financial stability benefits from more extensive use of swing pricing by UK corporate bond OEFs.

Keywords: Cost-benefit analysis, mutual funds, swing pricing, corporate bonds

JEL Classification: D61, G12, G23, G28

Suggested Citation

King, Benjamin and Semark, James, Reducing Liquidity Mismatch in Open-Ended Funds: A Cost-Benefit Analysis (April 22, 2022). Bank of England Working Paper No. 975, 2022, Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=4106646 or http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.4106646

Benjamin King (Contact Author)

Bank of England ( email )

Threadneedle Street
London, EC2R 8AH
United Kingdom

James Semark

Bank of England ( email )

Threadneedle Street
London, EC2R 8AH
United Kingdom

Do you have a job opening that you would like to promote on SSRN?

Paper statistics

Downloads
88
Abstract Views
481
Rank
605,034
PlumX Metrics