What To Teach When Teaching Law: The Categories, Rights, Duties And Test (‘CRDT’) Framework

Canberra Law Review 2022

16 Pages Posted: 31 May 2022

See all articles by Benedict Sheehy

Benedict Sheehy

University of Canberra

Juan Diaz-Granados

Australian Catholic University

Tomas Fitzgerald

Curtin University - Curtin Law School

Date Written: May 13, 2022

Abstract

This article provides a framework for law academics to teach law to all levels of students. It develops a ‘Categories, Rights, Duties and Test’ (CRDT) conceptual framework which provides a structure for thinking about teaching and about how law teaching can be developed in a more systematic fashion. The article introduces the CRDT framework, a framework which focuses attention on the distinctly legal concepts that provide the core building blocks for any legal system. Use of the framework also has the advantage that it helps students develop the core analytical skills necessary for legal practitioners. The distinctions created in the CRDT framework facilitates student learning as the students are able to transfer the same conceptual framework between different subjects. Further, we explain how this approach supports consideration of positive, professional, and policy aspects of law. Having repeated use of the CRDT framework strengthens students’ grasp of law not only as a practice and as an intellectual activity but the contribution law makes to policy. Finally, it facilitates sharper thinking about law and areas of law as it helps to distinguish the conceptual core of law as a discipline from the substantive content of a specific area of law. It moves the ‘what to teach’ beyond the doctrine-skills debate that has dominated the law academy for decades.

Keywords: Legal education, legal categories, rights, duties, tests, academic framework

Suggested Citation

Sheehy, Benedict and Diaz-Granados, Juan and Fitzgerald, Tomas, What To Teach When Teaching Law: The Categories, Rights, Duties And Test (‘CRDT’) Framework (May 13, 2022). Canberra Law Review 2022, Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=4108320

Benedict Sheehy

University of Canberra ( email )

Canberra, Australian Capital Territory 2601
Australia

Juan Diaz-Granados (Contact Author)

Australian Catholic University ( email )

8 Napier St
North Sydney, NSW 2060
Australia

Tomas Fitzgerald

Curtin University - Curtin Law School ( email )

Do you have negative results from your research you’d like to share?

Paper statistics

Downloads
64
Abstract Views
262
Rank
628,630
PlumX Metrics