A Comparison of High-Throughput Imaging Methods for Quantifying Plant Growth Traits and Estimating Above-Ground Biomass Accumulation

36 Pages Posted: 17 May 2022

See all articles by Riccardo Rossi

Riccardo Rossi

affiliation not provided to SSRN

Sergi Costafreda-Aumedes

affiliation not provided to SSRN

Stephan Summerer

affiliation not provided to SSRN

Marco Moriondo

National Research Council of Italy

Luisa Leolini

affiliation not provided to SSRN

Francesco Cellini

affiliation not provided to SSRN

Marco Bindi

University of Florence

Angelo Petrozza

affiliation not provided to SSRN

Multiple version iconThere are 2 versions of this paper

Abstract

Image-based estimation of above-ground biomass accumulation is recognized as the predominant asset of breeding programs for accelerating gains in crop adaptation and productivity. High-throughput phenotyping (HTP) has the potential to greatly facilitate genetic improvements by dissecting morphological traits which can serve as accurate predictors of optically sensed plant biomass. Thus, various high-throughput data acquisition methods have been recently developed to quantify desirable phenotypes from images. Novel insights are essential to provide helpful guidelines to breeders for the optimal selection of phenotyping approaches aimed at estimating plant biomass. In this study, three representative HTP data acquisition methods based on two-dimensional (2D) image analysis, Multi View Stereo (MVS)-Structure from Motion (SfM) three-dimensional (3D)-reconstruction and Structured Light (SL) 3D-scanning were compared for estimating fresh (FAGB) and dry above-ground biomass (DAGB) weight of potted plants at early growth stages. Two crop species with contrasting shape and canopy architecture, namely maize ( Zea mais L.) and tomato ( Lycopersicum esculentum L.), were used as model plants. First, the performances of each sensing approach were tested in the accurate reproduction of the major phenotypic traits and, secondly, in the reliable fresh/dry AGB estimation from the relevant allometric equations calibrated according multi- (six sampling dates, once a week) and mono-temporal (one sampling date at harvest time) datasets. The overall results demonstrated the effectiveness of the tested methods in reproducing the salient features of canopies with increasing architectural complexity, including plants’ height (R2 = 0.98, rRMSE = 7.73% and AIC = 475.07), shoot area (R2 = 0.91, rRMSE = 29.53% and AIC = 1369.77) and convex hull volume (R2 = 0.88, rRMSE = 27.32% and AIC = 818.19). In this context, the shoot area associated with the age of the plant was found to be the most indicative phenotypic determinant for an accurate estimation of DAGB and FAGB. Accordingly, the greater ability of the 2D image analysis in quantifying canopies of elongated plants characterized by thin organs ensured the best estimates of fresh/dry biomass accumulation in maize (0.99 ≤ R2 ≤ 0.98 and 8.98% ≤ rRMSE ≤ 16.03%, considering multi- and mono-temporal calibrated models). Contrariwise, the MVS-SfM 3D-reconstruction of more complex canopies with compact habit was advantageous for the accurate prediction of above-ground DAGB and FAGB dynamics in tomato (R2 = 0.99 and 6.70% ≤ rRMSE ≤ 15.82%, considering multi- and mono-temporal calibrated models). These findings provide references to carefully select the best suited HTP data acquisition approach for the accurate estimation of biomass accumulation across plants of different canopy complexity, thereby paving the way to break through current phenotyping bottlenecks in breeding applications for current and future food security.

Keywords: Digital biomass, high-throughput phenotyping platforms, Multi View Stereo, plant modelling

Suggested Citation

Rossi, Riccardo and Costafreda-Aumedes, Sergi and Summerer, Stephan and Moriondo, Marco and Leolini, Luisa and Cellini, Francesco and Bindi, Marco and Petrozza, Angelo, A Comparison of High-Throughput Imaging Methods for Quantifying Plant Growth Traits and Estimating Above-Ground Biomass Accumulation. Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=4111955 or http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.4111955

Riccardo Rossi

affiliation not provided to SSRN ( email )

No Address Available

Sergi Costafreda-Aumedes

affiliation not provided to SSRN ( email )

No Address Available

Stephan Summerer

affiliation not provided to SSRN ( email )

No Address Available

Marco Moriondo (Contact Author)

National Research Council of Italy ( email )

Luisa Leolini

affiliation not provided to SSRN ( email )

No Address Available

Francesco Cellini

affiliation not provided to SSRN ( email )

No Address Available

Marco Bindi

University of Florence ( email )

Piazza di San Marco, 4
Florence, 50121
Italy

Angelo Petrozza

affiliation not provided to SSRN

Do you have a job opening that you would like to promote on SSRN?

Paper statistics

Downloads
39
Abstract Views
321
PlumX Metrics