The Welfare Implications of Non-Patentable Financial Innovations
FAME Research Paper No. 82
43 Pages Posted: 15 Jul 2003
Date Written: March 2001
Abstract
Investment Banks invest in R&D to design innovative securities even when imitation is possible, i.e., when innovations cannot be patented. We show how a financial institution can profit from the development of financial products even if they are unpatentable. For certain types of financial products innovating investment banks have an information advantage over imitators. This information advantage makes them better competitors and market leaders. The mere possibility of costless imitation drives innovators' profits down, but still keeps them positive. The absence of patents allows part of the surplus generated by the innovation to be allocated to investors. The extent of surplus sharing depends on the degree of asymmetry in the information owned by imitators and innovators and on the total number of innovators. The larger this asymmetry, the higher the innovator's profits and the lower the investor's surplus. With more than one innovator all the surplus goes to investors.
Keywords: Financial innovation, imperfect imitation, patents
JEL Classification: G24, L12, K20
Suggested Citation: Suggested Citation
Do you have negative results from your research you’d like to share?
Recommended Papers
-
By Carmen Reinhart, Kenneth Rogoff, ...
-
International Institutions for Reducing Global Financial Instability
-
By Jonathan Eaton and Raquel Fernández
-
One Reason Countries Pay Their Debts: Renegotiation and International Trade
-
One Reason Countries Pay Their Debts: Renegotiation and International Trade
-
One Reason Countries Pay Their Debts: Renegotiation and International Trade
-
Can Output Losses Following International Financial Crises Be Avoided?
-
Defaultable Debt, Interest Rates and the Current Account
By Mark Aguiar and Gita Gopinath
-
Defaultable Debt, Interest Rates, and the Current Account
By Mark Aguiar and Gita Gopinath
-
Have Commercial Banks Ignored History?
By Sule Ozler