Medals in Transition
25 Pages Posted: 14 Jul 2003
Date Written: May 2003
Abstract
In this paper we study the determinants of provincial medal shares and of their dispersion for all the China National Games (from the 1950s to 2001), paying particular attention to change in behavior during the plan regime and the market regime. We find that provincial medal shares converged in the plan regime, and then diverged in the market regime. As in the Olympic medal literature, population and average income play fundamental roles in explaining medal shares. A novel finding is that the marginal productivities of both human and especially financial resources in raising medal shares are significantly higher in the market regime than in the plan regime. Moreover, the share of educated people is positively associated with medal share in the plan regime but not so in the market regime. The SOE share is positively related to medal share when it has ample variations, consistent with the literature on the Olympic Games that central planning economies appear to win more medals. Finally, rising urban-rural income disparity contributed to the divergence of medal shares for the last few National Games.
JEL Classification: D2, H4, H7, O1, P5
Suggested Citation: Suggested Citation
Do you have negative results from your research you’d like to share?
Recommended Papers
-
Coming to Play or Coming to Win: Participation and Success at the Olympic Games
By Daniel K. N. Johnson and Ayfer Ali
-
Who Wins the Olympic Games: Economic Development and Medal Totals
By Andrew B. Bernard and Meghan R. Busse
-
Who Wins the Olympic Games: Economic Development and Medal Totals
By Andrew B. Bernard and Meghan R. Busse