An Analysis of Eva and Other Measures of Firm Performance Based on Residual Income
Hankamer School of Business Working Paper
30 Pages Posted: 22 Jul 2003
Date Written: May 28, 2003
Abstract
This paper reviews the theoretical foundations of residual income as a tool for evaluating a firm's interim performance for purposes of assigning incentive compensation. Although residual income can be easily linked to the discounted cash flow model of firm valuation, it bears no necessary relation to wealth creation during any particular time period. Consequently, paying for performance using residual income to measure wealth creation can have incentive effects that are inconsistent with wealth creation. We show that recent attempts to address the shortcomings of residual income can effectively address the wealth measurement issue; however, they give rise to serious implementation problems related to the necessity for forecasting future firm performance. Furthermore, if internal forecasts of future firm performance are used, this is a source of a potentially serious moral hazard problem as the same managers whose performance is being evaluated provide the forecasts.
Keywords: Residual income, Economic Value Added, Performance measurement, Incentive compensation
JEL Classification: G31, G34, J33, M41, M46
Suggested Citation: Suggested Citation
Do you have a job opening that you would like to promote on SSRN?
Recommended Papers
-
Average Internal Rate of Return and Investment Decisions: A New Perspective
-
Addendum to ‘Average Internal Rate of Return and Investment Decisions: A New Perspective’
-
Net Present Value-Consistent Investment Criteria Based on Accruals
-
Investment Decisions, Net Present Value and Bounded Rationality
-
The Truth, the Whole Truth, and Nothing but the Truth: Fulfilling the Promise of Truth in Lending
-
Why IRR is Not the Rate of Return for Your Investment: Introducing AIRR to the Real Estate Community
-
Aggregate Return on Investment and Investment Decisions: A Cash-Flow Perspective
-
The Internal-Rate-of-Return Approach and the AIRR Paradigm: A Refutation and a Corroboration