Aid, Pro-Poor Government Spending and Welfare
CREDIT Working Paper No. 03/03
41 Pages Posted: 19 Jun 2003
Date Written: February 2003
Abstract
Our objective is to test the hypothesis that aid can improve the welfare of the poor. Part of this effect is direct, if aid is targeted on the poor, and part is indirected, via the transmission channel of aid-financed public spending on social services - sanitation, education and health. This indirect part is represented in an index of pro-poor public expenditures (PPE). As comparative data on poverty levels are scarce, we use two indicators of the welfare of the poor, namely infant mortality and the Human Development Index (HDI). We use a residual generated regressor to obtain a coefficient on the aid variable that includes the indirect effects through public expenditure allocation induced by aid. Estimation is based on a pooled panel of 39 countries over the period 1980 to 1998. We obtain results in support of our hypothesis that 'pro-poor' public expenditure is associated with increased levels of welfare, and we find evidence that aid is associated with improved values of the welfare indicators because aid finances pro-poor spending. In this way, aid potentially benefits the poor.
Suggested Citation: Suggested Citation
Do you have a job opening that you would like to promote on SSRN?
Recommended Papers
-
By A. Craig Burnside and David Dollar
-
Aid, Policies, and Growth: Revisiting the Evidence
By A. Craig Burnside and David Dollar
-
Who Gives Foreign Aid to Whom and Why?
By Alberto F. Alesina and David Dollar
-
Aid Allocation and Poverty Reduction
By David Dollar and Paul Collier
-
Aid and Growth: What Does the Cross-Country Evidence Really Show?
-
Aid and Growth: What Does the Cross-Country Evidence Really Show?
-
New Data, New Doubts: Revisiting 'Aid, Policies, and Growth'
By William Easterly, Ross Levine, ...
-
New Data, New Doubts: A Comment on Burnside and Dollar's "Aid, Policies, and Growth" (2000)
By William Easterly, Ross Levine, ...