The Truck and the Brakes: Understanding the Charter's Limitations and Notwithstanding Clauses Symmetrically

(2022) 105 Supreme Court Law Review (2d) 194-227

34 Pages Posted: 15 Jun 2022

See all articles by Geoffrey Sigalet

Geoffrey Sigalet

McGill Research Group on Constitutional Studies; University of British Columbia

Date Written: May 31, 2022

Abstract

How do statutes relate to the constitutional rights enumerated in the Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms? Section 1 of the Charter permits laws to establish “reasonable limits” on rights, while section 33 enables legislatures to enact laws “notwithstanding” certain provisions of the Charter. There is evidence that sections 1 and 33 were drafted to symmetrically offer legislatures the power to contest judicial activism. One way of reading the limitations and notwithstanding clauses together is to say that section 1 allows legislatures to “infringe” rights in ways that courts find justifiable, while section 33 allows legislatures to disagree with courts about what counts as a justified infringement. Another symmetrical approach is to read section 1 as allowing legislatures to “construct” the scope and nature of rights in ways that courts find justifiable, while section 33 empowers legislatures to disagree with courts about the scope of rights and liberties. In this essay I argue that the latter constructive approach to sections 1 and 33 fits better with the text of the Charter and is more justifiable as a matter of political morality. Sections 1 and 33 were primarily meant to allow legislatures to contest judicial interpretations of rights, not to suspend or override rights themselves. Although a majority of the Supreme Court dismissed the constructive approach to section 1 as a matter of “semantics” in Frank v. Canada (Attorney General), in the recent case of Toronto (City) v. Ontario (Attorney General) the Court has embraced a constructive approach to section 33. My argument suggests that a constructive approach to section 33 should be complemented by the kind of constructive reading of section 1 offered by Justices Côté and Brown in their dissent in Frank.

Keywords: limitations clause, section 1, notwithstanding clause, section 33, proportionality, rights, construction, specificationism

Suggested Citation

sigalet, Geoffrey, The Truck and the Brakes: Understanding the Charter's Limitations and Notwithstanding Clauses Symmetrically (May 31, 2022). (2022) 105 Supreme Court Law Review (2d) 194-227, Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=4124571

Geoffrey Sigalet (Contact Author)

McGill Research Group on Constitutional Studies ( email )

Room 414, Leacock Building
855 Sherbrooke Street West
Montreal, QC H3A 2T7
Canada

University of British Columbia ( email )

Kelowna, British Columbia
Canada

Do you have a job opening that you would like to promote on SSRN?

Paper statistics

Downloads
158
Abstract Views
513
Rank
281,012
PlumX Metrics