Comparative Costs and Financing of Permanent Dispute Settlement Mechanisms

Academic Forum on ISDS Concept Paper 2022/1

NYU School of Law, Public Law Research Paper No. 22-37

21 Pages Posted: 11 Jun 2022 Last revised: 19 Sep 2022

See all articles by Catharine Titi

Catharine Titi

CNRS; University Paris II Panthéon-Assas

Freya Baetens

PluriCourts Centre of Excellence, Law Faculty, Oslo University; Leiden University - Leiden Law School

Robert L. Howse

New York University School of Law

Marcin J. Menkes

Warsaw School of Economics (SGH) - Department of Finance and Management

Walter Elochukwu Abah

New York University School of Law

Date Written: June 7, 2022

Abstract

Different dispute settlement bodies have different budgets. These depend on a number of factors, including the functions of the dispute settlement body in question (eg the costs of international criminal courts include the costs of the work of the office of the prosecutor); the number of judges and the manner of their remuneration (eg while judges at the International Court of Justice receive a fixed annual salary, judges at the International Tribunal for the Law of the Sea (ITLOS) receive an annual allowance and for the remainder of their recompense are remunerated according to the time they serve on the Tribunal); the body’s membership and capacity to fund; and the extent to which the dispute settlement body relies on voluntary contributions.

For the purposes of this Academic Forum concept paper, the authors have elected to address the comparative costs and financing of the following permanent dispute settlement mechanisms: the ICJ; ITLOS; the Dispute Settlement Body (DSB) of the World Trade Organization (WTO); the International Criminal Court (ICC); the three regional human rights courts, that is the European Court of Human Rights, the Inter-American Court of Human Rights, and the African Court on Human and Peoples’ Rights; and the Iran-US Claims Tribunal (IUSCT). For each dispute settlement body, the paper addresses, first, the costs involved in its functioning and what is covered by the funding and, second, who finances the body. Instead of a conclusion, the paper presents a summary table of costs and financing of a selection of the above permanent dispute settlement bodies. In the interests of comparison, the table adds the costs and financing of the International Centre for Settlement of Investment Disputes (ICSID).

Keywords: costs, ISDS, permanent dispute settlement mechanisms, international courts, arbitration, ICJ, ITLOS, WTO DSB, ICC, ICSID

JEL Classification: K33, F02, F02, F13, F21, H77, E22, K41, K49, K40, K39, K30, K20, K29, K10, K19

Suggested Citation

Titi, Catharine and Baetens, Freya and Howse, Robert and Menkes, Marcin J. and Abah, Walter Elochukwu, Comparative Costs and Financing of Permanent Dispute Settlement Mechanisms (June 7, 2022). Academic Forum on ISDS Concept Paper 2022/1, NYU School of Law, Public Law Research Paper No. 22-37, Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=4130295 or http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.4130295

University Paris II Panthéon-Assas ( email )

CERSA, 12 place du Panthéon
Paris, 75005
France

HOME PAGE: http://catharinetiti.com

Freya Baetens

PluriCourts Centre of Excellence, Law Faculty, Oslo University ( email )

P.O. Box 6706
St. Olavs plass 5
0130 Oslo
Norway

HOME PAGE: http://https://www.jus.uio.no/ior/english/people/aca/freyab/

Leiden University - Leiden Law School ( email )

P.O. Box 9520
2300 RA Leiden, NL-2300RA
Netherlands

Robert Howse

New York University School of Law ( email )

40 Washington Square South
New York, NY 10012-1099
United States

HOME PAGE: http://rb.gy/0icrno

Marcin J. Menkes

Warsaw School of Economics (SGH) - Department of Finance and Management ( email )

Warsaw
Poland

Walter Elochukwu Abah

New York University School of Law ( email )

40 Washington Square S,
New York, NY 10012
New York, NY 10012
United States

Do you have a job opening that you would like to promote on SSRN?

Paper statistics

Downloads
83
Abstract Views
424
Rank
593,153
PlumX Metrics