Using Machine Learning to Enhance Prediction of Atrial Fibrillation Recurrence after Catheter Ablation

28 Pages Posted: 30 Jun 2022

See all articles by Mark Brahier

Mark Brahier

Georgetown University - Georgetown University Medical Center

Fengwei Zou

Yeshiva University - Montefiore Medical Center

Musa Abdulkareem

Government of the United Kingdom - Barts Health NHS Trust

Shwetha Kochi

Georgetown University - Georgetown University Medical Center

Frank Migliarese

Naval Medical Center San Diego

Alexandra Taylor

Northeastern University

Athanasios Thomaides

MedStar Heart and Vascular Institute

Xiaoyang Ma

Georgetown University - Georgetown University Medical Center

Colin O. Wu

Government of the United States of America - National Heart, Lung and Blood Institute

Veit Sandfort

Stanford University - School of Medicine

Peter J. Bergquist

MedStar Heart and Vascular Institute

Monvadi B. Srichai

MedStar Heart and Vascular Institute

Steffen E. Petersen

Government of the United Kingdom - Barts Health NHS Trust

Jose D. Vargas

Georgetown University

Abstract

Background: Traditional prognostic models for atrial fibrillation (AF) recurrence following catheter ablation utilize readily-available clinical and echocardiographic variables. This study generates a recurrence risk model using clinical variables combined with left atrial volume index (LAVi) derived from cardiac computed tomography (cCT) by means of a novel deep learning algorithm.

Methods: The retrospective study included 653 consecutive patients who underwent catheter ablation. All patients underwent pre-ablation cCT, and LAVi was computed using a novel deep learning algorithm. Clinical data including early recurrence (within three months) and late recurrence (after 3 months) was obtained.

Results: The most important variables contributing to late recurrence by RSF analysis included LAVi and early recurrence. In total, 5 covariates were identified as independent predictors of late recurrence in the multivariable regression: LAVi [HR 1.01 (1.01-1.02); p<0.001], early recurrence [HR 2.42 (1.90-3.09); p<0.001], statin use [HR 1.38 (1.09-1.75); p=0.007], beta blocker use [HR 1.29 (1.01-1.65); p=0.043], and adjunctive cavotricuspid isthmus ablation for atrial flutter [HR 0.74 (0.57-0.96); p=0.02]. Survival analysis revealed that patients with both LAVi >66.7 cm3/m2 and early recurrence had the highest late recurrence risk as compared to patients with LAVi <66.7 cm3/m2 and no early recurrence [HR 4.52 (3.36-6.08), p<0.001)].

Conclusions: Deep learning-derived, full volumetric LAVi from cCT was the most important pre-procedural variable for predicting late AF recurrence following catheter ablation. The combination of increased LAVi and early recurrence confers more than a four-fold increased risk of late recurrence.  Thus, machine learning methods can help risk stratify patients undergoing AF catheter ablation.

Note:

Funding Information: MA and SEP acknowledge support from the CAP-AI programme (led by Capital Enterprise in partnership with Barts Health NHS Trust and Digital Catapult and funded by the European Regional Development Fund and Barts Charity) and Health Data Research UK (HDR UK—an initiative funded by UK Research and Innovation, Department of Health and Social Care (England) and the devolved administrations, and leading medical research charities; www.hdruk.ac.uk). SEP acknowledges support from the National Institute for Health Research (NIHR) Biomedical Research Centre at Barts, from the SmartHeart EPSRC programme grant (www.nihr.ac.uk; EP/P001009/1) and the London Medical Imaging and AI Center for Value Based Healthcare. SEP has received funding from the European Union's Horizon 2020 research and innovation programme under grant agreement No. 825903 (euCanSHare project).

Declaration of Interests: SEP provides consultancy to and owns stock of Circle Cardiovascular Imaging Inc., Calgary, Alberta, Canada. No other competing interests.

Ethics Approval Statement: This study was approved by Georgetown-Medstar Institutional Review Board with waiver of informed consent.

Keywords: atrial fibrillation, catheter ablation, recurrence risk, left atrial volume index, Cardiac computed tomography, machine learning

Suggested Citation

Brahier, Mark and Zou, Fengwei and Abdulkareem, Musa and Kochi, Shwetha and Migliarese, Frank and Taylor, Alexandra and Thomaides, Athanasios and Ma, Xiaoyang and Wu, Colin O. and Sandfort, Veit and Bergquist, Peter J. and Srichai, Monvadi B. and Petersen, Steffen E. and Vargas, Jose D., Using Machine Learning to Enhance Prediction of Atrial Fibrillation Recurrence after Catheter Ablation. Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=4138247 or http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.4138247

Mark Brahier (Contact Author)

Georgetown University - Georgetown University Medical Center ( email )

Fengwei Zou

Yeshiva University - Montefiore Medical Center ( email )

111 East 210th Street
Bronx, NY 10467
United States

Musa Abdulkareem

Government of the United Kingdom - Barts Health NHS Trust ( email )

Shwetha Kochi

Georgetown University - Georgetown University Medical Center ( email )

4000 Reservoir Road, N.W., Suite 120
Washington, DC 20057
United States

Frank Migliarese

Naval Medical Center San Diego ( email )

San Diego, CA
USA

Alexandra Taylor

Northeastern University ( email )

220 B RP
Boston, MA 02115
United States

Athanasios Thomaides

MedStar Heart and Vascular Institute ( email )

Xiaoyang Ma

Georgetown University - Georgetown University Medical Center ( email )

4000 Reservoir Road, N.W., Suite 120
Washington, DC 20057
United States

Colin O. Wu

Government of the United States of America - National Heart, Lung and Blood Institute ( email )

Veit Sandfort

Stanford University - School of Medicine ( email )

Peter J. Bergquist

MedStar Heart and Vascular Institute ( email )

Monvadi B. Srichai

MedStar Heart and Vascular Institute ( email )

Steffen E. Petersen

Government of the United Kingdom - Barts Health NHS Trust ( email )

Jose D. Vargas

Georgetown University ( email )

Do you have a job opening that you would like to promote on SSRN?

Paper statistics

Downloads
43
Abstract Views
275
PlumX Metrics