Administrative Stays: Power and Procedure

44 Pages Posted: 22 Jun 2022

See all articles by Rachel Bayefsky

Rachel Bayefsky

University of Virginia School of Law

Date Written: June 20, 2022

Abstract

Federal courts are often asked to issue various forms of expedited relief, including stays pending appeal. This Article explores a little examined device that federal courts employ to freeze legal proceedings until they are able to rule on a party’s request for a stay pending appeal: the “administrative” or “temporary” stay. A decision whether to impose an administrative stay can have significant effects in the real world, as illustrated by recent high-profile litigation on topics including immigration and abortion. Yet federal courts have not endorsed a uniform standard for determining whether an administrative stay is warranted or clarified the basis for their power to issue such a stay. This Article draws attention to the administrative stay device and proposes standards to guide federal courts in determining when such a stay is appropriate. In so doing, the Article probes the bounds of federal courts’ equitable authority and the interests underlying their decisions about whether to grant interim relief in response to claims of impending harm.

Keywords: Stays, Federal Courts, Equity, Remedies

Suggested Citation

Bayefsky, Rachel, Administrative Stays: Power and Procedure (June 20, 2022). Notre Dame Law Review, Vol. 97, No. 5, 2022, Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=4140806

Rachel Bayefsky (Contact Author)

University of Virginia School of Law ( email )

580 Massie Road
Charlottesville, VA 22903
United States

HOME PAGE: http://www.law.virginia.edu/faculty/profile/yyt5yx/2994875

Do you have a job opening that you would like to promote on SSRN?

Paper statistics

Downloads
145
Abstract Views
708
rank
289,119
PlumX Metrics