Just and Reasonable Treatment: Racial Treatment in the Terms of Pauper Apprenticeship in Antebellum Maryland
45 Pages Posted: 9 Jun 2003 Last revised: 26 Aug 2022
Date Written: June 2003
Abstract
This paper investigates the economics of pauper apprenticeship in antebellum Maryland and several results emerge. Contrary to some earlier interpretations, the system did not arbitrarily indent poor children. Court officials negotiated contracts that reflected an apprentice's productivity; officials did not offer one-size-fits-all contracts to minimize the costs of indenting indigent children. Black and white children received comparable compensation during the term of the indenture, but blacks were promised and received substantially less education than whites. It was in the provision of education that Maryland's system discriminated against blacks and undermined their ability to achieve long-run economic independence.
Suggested Citation: Suggested Citation
Do you have negative results from your research you’d like to share?
Recommended Papers
-
The Returns to Skill in the United States Across the Twentieth Century
By Claudia Goldin and Lawrence F. Katz
-
Why the United States Led in Education: Lessons from Secondary School Expansion, 1910 to 1940
By Claudia Goldin and Lawrence F. Katz
-
The Shaping of Higher Education: The Formative Years in the United States, 1890 to 1940
By Claudia Goldin and Lawrence F. Katz
-
Education and Income in the Early 20th Century: Evidence from the Prairies
By Claudia Goldin and Lawrence F. Katz
-
Colorism and African American Wealth: Evidence from the Nineteenth-Century South
-
Recent Trends in Occupational Segregation by Gender: A Look Across the Atlantic
By Juan Jose Dolado, Florentino Felgueroso, ...
-
Recent Trends in Occupational Segregation by Gender: A Look Across the Atlantic
By Juan Jose Dolado, Florentino Felgueroso, ...
-
Changes in Black Family Structure: Implications for Welfare Dependency
By William A. Darity and Samuel Myers