The Limits of Experimental Jurisprudence

Cambridge Handbook of Experimental Jurisprudence, Forthcoming

USC CLASS Research Paper No. CLASS22-21

USC Law Legal Studies Paper No. 22-21

19 Pages Posted: 30 Jun 2022 Last revised: 9 Mar 2023

Date Written: July 19, 2022

Abstract

This chapter offers a critique of experimental jurisprudence. While experimental jurisprudence can make an important contribution to legal knowledge and legal theory, theorists and practitioners of experimental should also be aware of its limitations. Experimental jurisprudence cannot, by itself, resolve legal theoretical debates. It is just one limited tool, with an important but partial role to play in the collective project of understanding and evaluating law and legal rules, institutions, and practices. This chapter offers a summary survey of some of the limitations of experimental jurisprudence in special and general jurisprudence. It also argues that, if we want to fully understand law and legal concepts, practices, and institutions, experimental jurisprudence needs to be supplemented with other perspectives—such as those provided by anthropology, qualitative research, and the humanities. These perspectives can capture precisely what experimental jurisprudence must necessarily ignore: that law is a complex institutionalized social and cultural practice constituted by the thought and talk of legal experts.

Suggested Citation

Jiménez, Felipe, The Limits of Experimental Jurisprudence (July 19, 2022). Cambridge Handbook of Experimental Jurisprudence, Forthcoming, USC CLASS Research Paper No. CLASS22-21, USC Law Legal Studies Paper No. 22-21, Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=4148963 or http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.4148963

Felipe Jiménez (Contact Author)

USC Gould School of Law ( email )

Los Angeles, CA 90089
United States

Do you have a job opening that you would like to promote on SSRN?

Paper statistics

Downloads
143
Abstract Views
634
Rank
311,696
PlumX Metrics