Retributivism

U of Penn Law School, Public Law Research Paper No. 22-36, 2022

Oxford Handbook on Punishment Theory and Philosophy (Jesper Ryberg ed., Forthcoming)

30 Pages Posted: 1 Jul 2022

See all articles by Mitchell N. Berman

Mitchell N. Berman

University of Pennsylvania Carey Law School

Date Written: June 22, 2022

Abstract

Retributivism is a family of theories that purport to justify criminal punishment by reference to a wrongdoer’s negative desert. Individual members of the family differ from one another on many issues, including what it is that wrongdoers deserve and what is the character and force of the fact that they deserve it. This chapter lays out one retributive theory and sketches defenses of that theory against prominent anti-retributivist objections, including objections grounded in determinism. According to the theory this chapter dubs 'prospect retributivism', culpable wrongdoers deserve to experience their wrongdoing as personally costly to them, and the state assumes a pro tanto duty to cause wrongdoers to experience those costs in virtue of barring retaliation by victims and their surrogates.

Keywords: retributivism, negative retributivism, prospect retributivism, desert, negative desert, punishment, blameworthiness, determinism, favoring

Suggested Citation

Berman, Mitchell N., Retributivism (June 22, 2022). U of Penn Law School, Public Law Research Paper No. 22-36, 2022, Oxford Handbook on Punishment Theory and Philosophy (Jesper Ryberg ed., Forthcoming), Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=4150826

Mitchell N. Berman (Contact Author)

University of Pennsylvania Carey Law School ( email )

3501 Sansom Street
Philadelphia, PA 19104
United States

Do you have a job opening that you would like to promote on SSRN?

Paper statistics

Downloads
188
Abstract Views
501
Rank
246,112
PlumX Metrics