Medical Disobedience

82 Pages Posted: 22 Sep 2022 Last revised: 14 Feb 2023

See all articles by Dov Fox

Dov Fox

University of San Diego: School of Law

Date Written: July 2, 2022

Abstract

America's medical conscience regime is broken. Doctors or nurses who conscientiously deny care get shielded from being sued, fired, or prosecuted -- even if they don't tell patients what their options are. Yet there’s no solicitude for clinicians who have equally moral reasons to deliver treatment that their hospital or state restricts. This asymmetry selectively burdens providers and drives patients underground. Contested practices run the gamut: from abortion to aid-in-dying, from puberty blockers to conversion therapy, from opioids to ivermectin. Some the law permits; others it forbids. Some are safer, or cheaper. Others fall within the medical norm, rather than push its boundaries. These particulars matter. So does the fact that conscientious provision honors patients’ wishes, while conscientious refusal overrides them. A principled system would protect refusers less and providers more, with carve-outs for both tailored to distinct levels of authority: the employer and the government. Conscience exemptions from workplace policies demand clear disclosures and meaningful offsets: both to shore up patient access and to distance institutions from services they oppose. For civil or criminal violations, conscience should excuse partially at most. No blanket immunity for malpractice or abandonment. A limited defense, for providers too, would mitigate punishments for supplying clinically reasonable care. The long-simmering tension between law and medicine has reached a boiling point today. Cooling it requires equipping a diverse society and dynamic profession to navigate the controversies of our time and adapt to change from within.

Note:
Funding Information: None.

Conflict of Interests: No competing interests.

Keywords: conscience, pluralism, standard of care, act/omission, informed consent

JEL Classification: K13, K14, I14, I18, I31, J71, J78

Suggested Citation

Fox, Dov, Medical Disobedience (July 2, 2022). 136 Harvard Law Review 1030, San Diego Legal Studies Paper No. 22-028, Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=4152472 or http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.4152472

Dov Fox (Contact Author)

University of San Diego: School of Law ( email )

5998 Alcalá Park
San Diego, CA 92110
United States
(619) 260-4600 (Phone)

HOME PAGE: https://www.sandiego.edu/law/about/directory/biography.php?profile_id=3332

Do you have a job opening that you would like to promote on SSRN?

Paper statistics

Downloads
825
Abstract Views
4,113
Rank
56,307
PlumX Metrics