Private Law Legalism

Forthcoming, 73 (4) University of Toronto Law Journal (2023)

USC CLASS Research Paper No. CLASS22-22

USC Law Legal Studies Paper No. 22-22

44 Pages Posted: 16 Jul 2022 Last revised: 21 Jul 2022

Date Written: July 19, 2022

Abstract

Judges decide multiple types of disputes, including disputes involving the property or contractual rights of two private parties (their “private rights”). The nature of these private rights has long been the focus of philosophical debates between conventionalists, non-conventionalists, and Kantians. In this paper, I offer an argument in favor of the adoption of a legalist concept of private rights by judges and lawyers involved in private law disputes. According to private law legalism, judges and lawyers should see these rights as purely legal rights that do not reflect any pre-existing moral entitlements but are simply the upshots of positive law. The reason for adopting this legalist view is that it contributes to the rationality, predictability, and stability of legal reasoning, as well as to an appropriate evaluative stance towards positive law. Thus understood, the argument for legalism is not an argument about the nature of private rights, but about the conception of such rights that participants in private law reasoning ought to adopt.

Suggested Citation

Jiménez, Felipe, Private Law Legalism (July 19, 2022). Forthcoming, 73 (4) University of Toronto Law Journal (2023), USC CLASS Research Paper No. CLASS22-22, USC Law Legal Studies Paper No. 22-22, Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=4161123 or http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.4161123

Felipe Jiménez (Contact Author)

USC Gould School of Law ( email )

Los Angeles, CA 90089
United States

Do you have a job opening that you would like to promote on SSRN?

Paper statistics

Downloads
154
Abstract Views
535
rank
277,405
PlumX Metrics