The Imitation Game: How Encouraging Renegotiation Makes Good Borrowers Bad

99 Pages Posted: 28 Jul 2022 Last revised: 27 Mar 2024

See all articles by Sean Flynn

Sean Flynn

Cornell SC Johnson College of Business

Andra C. Ghent

University of Utah - David Eccles School of Business

Alexei Tchistyi

Cornell SC Johnson College of Business

Date Written: June 10, 2024

Abstract

We show that commercial mortgage borrowers behave opportunistically to attempt to obtain principal reductions. We develop a model in which lenders cannot perfectly observe borrowers' use values and renegotiation is costly. We then exploit a tax rule change that reduced the cost of renegotiation. Consistent with the model predictions, borrowers with high private use values of the property are more likely to transfer into special servicing when lenders have a higher capacity to negotiate principal reductions after the rule change. Our results suggest adverse consequences of principal forgiveness for lenders.

Keywords: principal forgiveness, CMBS, asymmetric information, loan renegotiation, IRS Revenue Procedure 2009-45

JEL Classification: G14, G21, G28, R30.

Suggested Citation

Flynn, Sean and Ghent, Andra C. and Tchistyi, Alexei, The Imitation Game: How Encouraging Renegotiation Makes Good Borrowers Bad (June 10, 2024). Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=4170883 or http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.4170883

Sean Flynn (Contact Author)

Cornell SC Johnson College of Business ( email )

Ithaca, NY 14850
United States

Andra C. Ghent

University of Utah - David Eccles School of Business ( email )

1645 E Campus Center Dr
Salt Lake City, UT 84112-9303
United States

Alexei Tchistyi

Cornell SC Johnson College of Business ( email )

Ithaca, NY 14850
United States

Do you have a job opening that you would like to promote on SSRN?

Paper statistics

Downloads
124
Abstract Views
657
Rank
459,592
PlumX Metrics