Comparative Economic and Environmental Assessments of Furrow- and Flood-Irrigated Rice Production Systems

36 Pages Posted: 27 Jul 2022

See all articles by Lanier Lawton Nalley

Lanier Lawton Nalley

affiliation not provided to SSRN

Joe Massey

affiliation not provided to SSRN

Alvaro Durand-Morat

University of Arkansas

Aaron Shew

affiliation not provided to SSRN

Ranjan Parajuli

affiliation not provided to SSRN

Francis Tsiboe

Kansas State University

Abstract

Rice producers in the Mid-South of the United States face decreasing groundwater availability and increasing pumping depths which may jeopardize sustainable rice production. Recently, producers have started adopting furrow irrigated rice (FIR) which reduces irrigation requirements by approximately 17% compared to conventionally flooded rice (CIR). Although driven by water savings and ease of planting and harvesting, as FIR does not require levies to be built, there are both yield (quantity) and milling (quality) concerns with FIR production. While some view FIR as a more sustainable production practice because of its reduced water usage, a comprehensive Life Cycle Analysis (LCA) has not been conducted to compare the two production systems. This study compares the economic (yield differences, NPV of water conserved and milling discounts/premiums) and environmental (a stepwise LCA which monetizes the holistic environmental of CIR and FIR on a per kg of rice basis) differences between CIR and FIR. Profitability results indicate that CIR more profitable and LCA results show that CIR is more environmentally sustainable. These results present a Gordian knot for policy makers and rice stakeholders alike as they struggle between a production practice that has a lower environmental impact (CIR) versus one that conserves water, reduces soil disturbance, and offers more flexibility to respond to market and weather conditions (FIR). Water savings has historically been a key focus of rice production from an environmental sustainability standpoint. Our research indicates that failure to both recognize and quantify holistic environmental metrics besides water savings may provide misleading recommendations.

Keywords: rice, LCA, Furrow-irrigation

Suggested Citation

Nalley, Lanier Lawton and Massey, Joe and Durand-Morat, Alvaro and Shew, Aaron and Parajuli, Ranjan and Tsiboe, Francis, Comparative Economic and Environmental Assessments of Furrow- and Flood-Irrigated Rice Production Systems. Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=4173871 or http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.4173871

Lanier Lawton Nalley (Contact Author)

affiliation not provided to SSRN ( email )

No Address Available

Joe Massey

affiliation not provided to SSRN ( email )

No Address Available

Alvaro Durand-Morat

University of Arkansas

Aaron Shew

affiliation not provided to SSRN ( email )

No Address Available

Ranjan Parajuli

affiliation not provided to SSRN ( email )

No Address Available

Francis Tsiboe

Kansas State University ( email )

Manhatten, KS 66506-4001
United States

Do you have a job opening that you would like to promote on SSRN?

Paper statistics

Downloads
16
Abstract Views
71
PlumX Metrics