Outcome Versus Service Based Payment in Health Care: Lessons from African Traditional Healers
37 Pages Posted: 23 Jun 2003 Last revised: 10 Apr 2022
Date Written: June 2003
Abstract
We compare the more common physician compensation method of fee-for-service to the less common payment-for-outcomes method. This paper combines an investigation of the theoretical properties of both of these payment regimes with a unique data set from rural Cameroon in which patients can choose between outcome and service based payments. We show that consideration of the role of patient effort in the production of health leads to important differences in the performance of these contracts. Theory and empirical evidence show that when illnesses require (or are responsive to) large amounts of both patient and practitioner effort, outcome based payment schemes are superior to effort based schemes. The traditional healer -- a practitioner who offers health services on an outcome-contingent basis -- is advanced as an important example of how patient effort can be better understood and tapped in health care.
Suggested Citation: Suggested Citation
Do you have a job opening that you would like to promote on SSRN?
Recommended Papers
-
Money for Nothing: The Dire Straits of Medical Practice in Delhi, India
By Jishnu Das and Jeffrey S. Hammer
-
Strained Mercy: The Quality of Medical Care in Delhi
By Jishnu Das and Jeffrey S. Hammer
-
Short But Not Sweet: New Evidence on Short Duration Morbidities from India
-
African Traditional Healers and Outcome--Contingent Contracts in Health Care
-
Which Doctor? Combining Vignettes and Item Response to Measure Doctor Quality
By Jishnu Das and Jeffrey S. Hammer
-
The Quality of Medical Advice in Low-Income Countries
By Jishnu Das, Jeffrey S. Hammer, ...
-
African Traditional Healers: Incentives and Skill in Health Care Delivery
-
Asymmetric Information and the Role of Ngos in African Health Care