Do Investors Care About Negative Returns?

51 Pages Posted: 12 Aug 2022 Last revised: 25 May 2023

See all articles by Borys Koval

Borys Koval

Vienna Graduate School of Finance (VGSF)

Alina Steshkova

Vienna University of Economics and Business

Date Written: August 7, 2022

Abstract

In this paper, we analyse the impact of negative return frequency and the recency bias on future stock market returns. Specifically, we propose a strategy that is based on counting of daily negative returns during the previous month, where investors earn 11.9% p.a. using exponentially-weighted daily returns. Our results show that the exponentially-weighted strategy outperforms the equally-weighted strategy and is robust to a range of existing risk factors and the firms’ characteristics, suggesting that the most recent observations during the month receive more investors’ attention and are the most relevant for future performance. The exponentially weighted strategy remains significant for stocks in S&P 500 after transaction costs. Although the return of the exponentially-weighted strategy is positive for stocks held by institutional and retail investors, it is the highest for stocks that are largely held by retail traders.

Keywords: Stock returns, return predictability, asset management, behavioural asset pricing, recency bias, hot-hand fallacy, binary bias

JEL Classification: G11, G12, G40

Suggested Citation

Koval, Borys and Steshkova, Alina, Do Investors Care About Negative Returns? (August 7, 2022). Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=4183853 or http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.4183853

Borys Koval

Vienna Graduate School of Finance (VGSF) ( email )

Welthandelsplatz 1
Vienna, 1020
Austria

Alina Steshkova (Contact Author)

Vienna University of Economics and Business ( email )

Welthandelsplatz 1
Vienna, Wien 1020
Austria

Do you have a job opening that you would like to promote on SSRN?

Paper statistics

Downloads
317
Abstract Views
1,176
Rank
206,703
PlumX Metrics