Does the 1L Curriculum Make a Difference?

(2022). Georgetown Law Faculty Publications and Other Works. 2465.

35 Pages Posted: 17 Aug 2022 Last revised: 4 Jan 2023

See all articles by David A. Hyman

David A. Hyman

Georgetown University Law Center

Jing Liu

East China University of Political Science and Law

Joshua C. Teitelbaum

Georgetown University Law Center

Date Written: January 3, 2023

Abstract

Georgetown Law’s Curriculum B (also known as Section 3) offers a unique opportunity to study an alternative 1L curriculum. The standard 1L curriculum has been around for decades and is still offered at the vast majority of U.S. law schools. Leaders in the legal academy often talk about experimenting with the 1L curriculum, but hardly anyone does it. Georgetown Law has. We study whether Georgetown’s Curriculum B yields measurable differences in student outcomes. Our empirical design leverages the fact that enrollment in Curriculum B is done by lottery when it is oversubscribed—meaning our study is effectively a randomized controlled trial. We measure treatment effects of Curriculum B by comparing outcomes of students who received the treatment (Curriculum B) with outcomes of students who received the placebo (Curriculum A) but wanted the treatment. Because students in both the treatment and control groups elected to enroll in Curriculum B, our empirical design overcomes the issue of selection bias. If we were to naïvely compare outcomes of students who took Curriculum B with those of students who took Curriculum A, our results would confound treatment and selection effects. By limiting our attention to students who elected to enroll in Curriculum B, we are able to isolate Curriculum B’s treatment effects. We find that taking Curriculum B decreases students’ performance in two business law electives (Corporations and Securities Regulation) and reduces the rate at which they graduate with Latin honors. We also find that it decreases students' likelihood of working in the private sector (law firm or business/industry) and increases their likelihood of working in the public sector (government or public interest) or doing a judicial clerkship. At the same, however, we find no statistically significant effects on other outcomes, including students’ cumulative GPA, their chances of passing the bar exam or being employed 10 months after graduation, or their rate or amount of alumni giving.

Keywords: 1L curriculum, Curriculum B, Georgetown Law, Section 3

JEL Classification: K00, K10

Suggested Citation

Hyman, David A. and Liu, Jing and Teitelbaum, Joshua C., Does the 1L Curriculum Make a Difference? (January 3, 2023). (2022). Georgetown Law Faculty Publications and Other Works. 2465., Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=4186084 or http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.4186084

David A. Hyman

Georgetown University Law Center ( email )

600 New Jersey Avenue, NW
Washington, DC 20001
United States

Jing Liu

East China University of Political Science and Law

Shanghai, Shanghai
China

Joshua C. Teitelbaum (Contact Author)

Georgetown University Law Center ( email )

600 New Jersey Avenue NW
Washington, DC 20001
United States
202-661-6589 (Phone)

Do you have a job opening that you would like to promote on SSRN?

Paper statistics

Downloads
416
Abstract Views
920
Rank
107,090
PlumX Metrics