Preemption & Gender & Racial (In)equity: Why State Tort Law Is Needed in the Cosmetic Context

65 Pages Posted: 19 Aug 2022

See all articles by Marie Boyd

Marie Boyd

University of South Carolina School of Law

Date Written: August 11, 2022

Abstract

Much of the legal scholarship on the preemption of state tort law in the food and drug context and beyond has focused on issues of federalism. While the literature has considered the relationship between state tort law and the regulatory system, it has not generally explored the impact the federal preemption of state tort law may have on women and people of color. Similarly, while the literature has grappled with gender and racial justice issues in the tort system, including in the context of tort reform, it has largely not examined the gender and racial equity issues raised by federal preemption. This Article fills this gap by examining how the federal preemption of state tort law may perpetuate and even compound existing racial and gender inequities in the context of cosmetics. It considers how tort law, coupled with appropriate federal regulatory reform, may help lead to safer cosmetics for all.

Keywords: Food and Drug Law, Cosmetics Law, Torts, Race, Gender, Cosmetics, Preemption, FDA

Suggested Citation

Boyd, Marie, Preemption & Gender & Racial (In)equity: Why State Tort Law Is Needed in the Cosmetic Context (August 11, 2022). Boston University Law Review, Vol. 102, No. 1, 2022, Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=4188115

Marie Boyd (Contact Author)

University of South Carolina School of Law ( email )

1525 Senate Street
Columbia, SC 29208
United States

Do you have a job opening that you would like to promote on SSRN?

Paper statistics

Downloads
16
Abstract Views
83
PlumX Metrics