Justice Breyer and Patent Eligibility

21 UIC Rev. Intell. Prop. L. 71 (2022)

SMU Dedman School of Law Legal Studies Research Paper No. 566

13 Pages Posted: 24 Aug 2022 Last revised: 24 Feb 2023

See all articles by David O. Taylor

David O. Taylor

Southern Methodist University - Dedman School of Law

Date Written: 2022

Abstract

Justice Breyer leaves the Supreme Court having left a significant mark on patent eligibility law. In Mayo Collaborative Services v. Prometheus Laboratories, he eliminated the ability to obtain patents on many useful applications of new (and even breakthrough) discoveries. The author discusses how Justice Breyer’s test for patent eligibility both contradicts the historical approach and has had pernicious impact on the patent system and investment in development of technology, including, and in particular, medical technologies.

Keywords: Patents, Patent eligibility, Mayo Collaborative Services v. Prometheus Laboratories, Bilski v. Kappos, Intellectual property, Justice Breyer, Patent laws and legislation, Medical technology, Discoveries

Suggested Citation

Taylor, David O., Justice Breyer and Patent Eligibility (2022). 21 UIC Rev. Intell. Prop. L. 71 (2022), SMU Dedman School of Law Legal Studies Research Paper No. 566, Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=4198443

David O. Taylor (Contact Author)

Southern Methodist University - Dedman School of Law ( email )

P.O. Box 750116
Dallas, TX 75275
United States

HOME PAGE: http://www.smu.edu/Law/Faculty/Profiles/Taylor-David-O

Do you have a job opening that you would like to promote on SSRN?

Paper statistics

Downloads
46
Abstract Views
707
PlumX Metrics