Harmonizing Legal Ethics Rules with Advocacy Norms

36 Geo. J. Legal Ethics ___ (2022) (Forthcoming)

Loyola University New Orleans College of Law Research Paper (Forthcoming)

47 Pages Posted: 24 Aug 2022 Last revised: 11 Sep 2022

See all articles by Dane S. Ciolino

Dane S. Ciolino

Loyola University New Orleans College of Law

Date Written: August 24, 2022

Abstract

For millennia, advocates have used extra-evidentiary persuasion techniques to tip the scales in favor of their clients. They appeal to emotion, develop personal credibility, and tell stories to influence tribunals with irrelevancies. But in so doing, lawyers violate more recent legal ethics and adjudication rules that facially prohibit such widely accepted advocacy practices. This Article addresses the disconnect between these rules and advocacy norms. It argues that the lack of congruence between the rules as written and as enforced runs afoul of the rule of law. It concludes that legal ethics and adjudication rules should be revised to include a flexible reasonableness standard that is compatible with age-old advocacy norms.

Keywords: legal ethics, professional responsibility, advocacy, extra-evidentiary persuasion, rhetoric

Suggested Citation

Ciolino, Dane S., Harmonizing Legal Ethics Rules with Advocacy Norms (August 24, 2022). 36 Geo. J. Legal Ethics ___ (2022) (Forthcoming), Loyola University New Orleans College of Law Research Paper (Forthcoming), Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=4199651

Dane S. Ciolino (Contact Author)

Loyola University New Orleans College of Law ( email )

7214 St. Charles Ave., Box 901
Campus Box 901
New Orleans, LA 70118
504-975-3263 (Phone)
504-861-5482 (Fax)

Do you have a job opening that you would like to promote on SSRN?

Paper statistics

Downloads
21
Abstract Views
37
PlumX Metrics