Is Lending Distance Really Changing?  Distance Dynamics and Loan Composition in Small Business Lending

53 Pages Posted: 27 Aug 2022

See all articles by Robert M. Adams

Robert M. Adams

Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System

Kenneth P. Brevoort

Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System

John C. Driscoll

Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System

Abstract

Some researchers have used increasing small business lending distances to argue that technological changes have reduced banks' reliance on soft information. These studies generally assume distance changes are uniform across loans and lenders. Our paper examines heterogeneity in distance changes. We show that while average distances have increased substantially over the past two decades, individual-bank distances remain unchanged. Instead, average increases are caused by a small number of banks who specialize in very small loans and whose share of lending has grown from 3 to 13%. Outside of these very small loans, small businesses continue to depend on local banks.

Keywords: banking, small business lending, soft information, lending distance

Suggested Citation

Adams, Robert M. and Brevoort, Kenneth and Driscoll, John C., Is Lending Distance Really Changing?  Distance Dynamics and Loan Composition in Small Business Lending. Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=4202216

Robert M. Adams

Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System ( email )

20th Street and Constitution Avenue NW
Washington, DC 20551
United States
202-452-2653 (Phone)

Kenneth Brevoort

Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System ( email )

20th Street and Constitution Avenue NW
Washington, DC 20551
United States

John C. Driscoll (Contact Author)

Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System ( email )

20th Street and Constitution Avenue NW
Washington, DC 20551
United States

HOME PAGE: http://www.federalreserve.gov/econresdata/john-c-driscoll.htm

Do you have a job opening that you would like to promote on SSRN?

Paper statistics

Downloads
57
Abstract Views
245
Rank
697,684
PlumX Metrics