Shedding Light on the Roberts Court Shadow Docket

17 Pages Posted: 15 Sep 2022

See all articles by Ben Johnson

Ben Johnson

University of Florida Levin College of Law

Logan Strother

Purdue University - Department of Political Science

Date Written: August 27, 2022

Abstract

Despite its recent fame the Supreme Court’s “shadow docket” is poorly understood. We describe the range of activities that fall under that moniker and present novel data to enable study of this overlooked part of the Court’s work. We show that the Roberts Court is granting more emergency relief orders while simultaneously generating more public dissent from justices. We also provide evidence of ideological decision-making on the shadow docket. Additionally, we draw attention to a previously ignored component of the shadow docket: the Court’s use of orders to shape the contours of cases on the merits docket. We show that the Roberts Court regularly changes the questions to be answered in merits cases in ways that have major implications for both real-world policy and theories of judicial behavior. We conclude by showing how these data can inform broader studies of the Supreme Court involving ideology, amici, opinion bargaining, and more.

Keywords: Supreme Court, shadow docket, ideal point estimation

Suggested Citation

Johnson, Ben and Strother, Logan, Shedding Light on the Roberts Court Shadow Docket (August 27, 2022). Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=4202390 or http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.4202390

Ben Johnson

University of Florida Levin College of Law ( email )

P.O. Box 117625
Gainesville, FL 32611-7625
United States

Logan Strother (Contact Author)

Purdue University - Department of Political Science ( email )

100 North University Street
West Lafayette, IN
United States

Do you have a job opening that you would like to promote on SSRN?

Paper statistics

Downloads
205
Abstract Views
847
Rank
246,691
PlumX Metrics