Digital Currency Industry Self-Regulation: Not All Consensus is Automatic

22 Pages Posted: 22 Sep 2022 Last revised: 18 Nov 2022

See all articles by Eric Alston

Eric Alston

Finance Division, University of Colorado Boulder

Date Written: September 1, 2022

Abstract

The appropriate boundary between public and private regulation has long been of interest to law and economics scholars. Especially relevant for understanding the private regulatory dynamics of the digital currency industry are the ways in which self-regulation has existed in financial markets. These studies suggest that too much market concentration and too much competition both diminish the possibility for self-regulation in the interest of consumers. Similarly, certain exchange roles give rise to permission of market manipulation by sub-classes of actors in a way that make exchange self-regulation less likely. Nonetheless, the unique technical features of blockchain networks, and the way in which consumers and industry participants uniquely value transparency and immutability means the possibility for productive self-regulation to benefit retail consumers may be greater than skeptics make it out to be. Furthermore, industry self-regulation can preempt or substitute for more distortionary or ill-fitting regulation emanating from public authorities. Finally, given the inevitability of public regulation, this suggests that developing digital currency industry complementarities along the lines of those studied in banking and commodities and securities exchanges is likely to shed light on the emergent dynamics of industry self-regulation most likely to benefit consumers.

Keywords: Blockchain, Cryptocurrencies, Digital Currencies, Financial Regulation, Self-regulation, Law and economics, Financial Economics

JEL Classification: B52, D82, F38, G14, G18, G28, K00, K22, K24, L86, O38

Suggested Citation

Alston, Eric, Digital Currency Industry Self-Regulation: Not All Consensus is Automatic (September 1, 2022). Law & Economics Center at George Mason University Scalia Law School Research Paper Series No. 22-038, Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=4207082 or http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.4207082

Eric Alston (Contact Author)

Finance Division, University of Colorado Boulder ( email )

Campus Box 419
Boulder, CO 80309
United States

Do you have a job opening that you would like to promote on SSRN?

Paper statistics

Downloads
72
Abstract Views
529
rank
462,959
PlumX Metrics