Towards a European Social Taxonomy: A Scorecard Approach

36 Pages Posted: 25 Sep 2022 Last revised: 25 Jan 2023

See all articles by Dirk A. Zetzsche

Dirk A. Zetzsche

Universite du Luxembourg - Faculty of Law, Economics and Finance; Heinrich Heine University Dusseldorf - Center for Business & Corporate Law (CBC); European Banking Institute

Marco Bodellini

University of Luxembourg

Roberta Consiglio

University of Luxembourg, ADA Chair in Financial Law (inclusive finance)

Date Written: September 14, 2022

Abstract

This paper analyzes the EU’s efforts in designing a social taxonomy for sustainable investments. Examining the draft Social Taxonomy proposed by the Platform for Sustainable Finance in early 2022, we challenge the decision to follow the methodology provided by the EU’s environmental taxonomy detailed in the Taxonomy Regulation. We criticize in particular its “winner takes all” character whereby only economic activities meeting both furthering and facilitating characteristics and the do-no-significant-harm (DNSH) principle – as narrowly defined by a set of Technical Screening Criteria adopted in Level 2 legislation – can be classified as sustainable. Furthermore, the environmental taxonomy methodology seems to fail to properly incentivize transitional and mitigating economic activities, prompting the need to adopt an additional classification system for that purpose. Despite countless words, taxonomy rules remain incomplete and occasionally vague. This regulatory complexity carries enormous transaction costs for issuers, advisors and financial institutions. This observation casts doubt on the ability of the taxonomy framework to support the transition into a sustainable EU economy.

Contemplating these deficiencies, we propose an alternative scorecard approach assigning lower scores for transitional and mitigating activities and higher scores for activities meeting stricter taxonomy system criteria. While we admit that this might lessen accuracy for some aspects, the advantage of a scorecard approach lies in its adaptability and indicative effect, putting an emphasis on economic activity’s transition towards sustainability.

Keywords: Social taxonomy, environmental taxonomy, sustainability, ESG, sustainable finance, finance regulation

JEL Classification: K00, K1, K2, K10, K22, K23, K32, G23, G41, Q2

Suggested Citation

Zetzsche, Dirk Andreas and Bodellini, Marco and Consiglio, Roberta, Towards a European Social Taxonomy: A Scorecard Approach (September 14, 2022). Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=4218874 or http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.4218874

Dirk Andreas Zetzsche

Universite du Luxembourg - Faculty of Law, Economics and Finance ( email )

Luxembourg, L-1511
Luxembourg

HOME PAGE: http://wwwen.uni.lu/recherche/fdef/research_unit_in_law/equipe/dirk_andreas_zetzsche

Heinrich Heine University Dusseldorf - Center for Business & Corporate Law (CBC) ( email )

Universitaetsstr. 1
D-40225 Düsseldorf
Germany
+49 211 81 15084 (Phone)
+49 211 81 11427 (Fax)

European Banking Institute ( email )

Frankfurt
Germany

Marco Bodellini (Contact Author)

University of Luxembourg ( email )

2 avenue de l'Université
Luxembourg, L-4365
Luxembourg

Roberta Consiglio

University of Luxembourg, ADA Chair in Financial Law (inclusive finance) ( email )

4, rue Alphonse Weicker L-2721 Luxembourg
Luxembourg, L-1511
Luxembourg

Do you have a job opening that you would like to promote on SSRN?

Paper statistics

Downloads
136
Abstract Views
462
Rank
336,433
PlumX Metrics