Digital Inequality: A Research Agenda

Puaschunder, J.M. (2022). Behavioral International Law: Law-in-books vs. Law-in-action Resembling the Neoclassical Economics vs. Behavioral Economics Debate. Proceedings of the 28th Research Association for Interdisciplinary Studies (RAIS) conference, pp. 120-127, June 2022.

9 Pages Posted: 12 Oct 2022

See all articles by Julia M. Puaschunder

Julia M. Puaschunder

Columbia University; New School for Social Research; Harvard University; The Situationist Project on Law and Mind Sciences

Date Written: September 21, 2022

Abstract

We live in the age of digitalization. Digital disruption is the advancement of our lifetimes. Never before in the history of humankind have human beings given up as much decision-making autonomy as today to a growing body of artificial intelligence (AI). Digitalization features a wave of self-learning entities that generate information from exponentially-growing big data sources that are encroaching every aspect of our daily lives. Inequality is one of the most significant pressing concern of our times. Ample evidence exists in economics, law and historical studies that multiple levels of inequality dominate the current socio-dynamics, politics and living conditions around the world. Social inequality stretches from societal levels within nation states to global dimensions but also intergenerational inequality domains. While digitalization and inequality are predominant features of our times, hardly any information exists on the inequality inherent in digitalization. This paper breaks new ground in theoretically arguing for inequality being an overlooked by-product of innovative change – featuring concrete examples in insights and applications in the digitalization domain. A multi-faceted analysis will draw a contemporary digital inequality account from behavioral economic, macroeconomic, comparative and legal economic perspectives. This paper targets at aiding academics and practitioners in understanding the advantages but also the potential inequalities imbued in digitalization. It sets a historic landmark to capture the Zeitgeist of our digitalization disruption heralding unexpected inequalities stemming from innovative change. The article may open eyes to understand our times holistically in its advantageous innovation capacities but also potential societal, international and intertemporal unequal gains and losses perspectives from digitalization.

Keywords: AI, Artificial Intelligence, Behavioral Economics, Behavioral Macroeconomics, Behavioral Law & Economics, Big Data, Big Data Insights, Coronavirus crisis, COVID-19, Digital Inequality, Digitalization, Disparate Impact, Economics, Equality, Law, Law & Economics, Monetary Policy, Multiplier

Suggested Citation

Puaschunder, Julia M., Digital Inequality: A Research Agenda (September 21, 2022). Puaschunder, J.M. (2022). Behavioral International Law: Law-in-books vs. Law-in-action Resembling the Neoclassical Economics vs. Behavioral Economics Debate. Proceedings of the 28th Research Association for Interdisciplinary Studies (RAIS) conference, pp. 120-127, June 2022., Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=4226245 or http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.4226245

Julia M. Puaschunder (Contact Author)

Columbia University ( email )

3022 Broadway
New York, NY 10027
United States

New School for Social Research ( email )

6 East 16th Street
New York, NY 10003
United States

Harvard University ( email )

24 Oxford Street
Cambridge, MA 02138
United States

The Situationist Project on Law and Mind Sciences ( email )

24 Oxford Street
Cambridge, MA 02138
United States

Do you have a job opening that you would like to promote on SSRN?

Paper statistics

Downloads
51
Abstract Views
181
Rank
607,201
PlumX Metrics