Almost Citing Slavery: Townshend v. Townshend in Wills and Trusts Casebooks

14 Pages Posted: 10 Oct 2022 Last revised: 23 Oct 2022

See all articles by Diane Kemker

Diane Kemker

Southern University Law Center

Date Written: October 6, 2022

Abstract

This essay applies the principles and lessons of Justin Simard's "Citing Slavery" to a specific legal doctrine, "insane delusion," and its treatment in contemporary casebooks. While Simard focuses on the judicial citation of slavery cases, this essay addresses legal pedagogy, the use of slavery cases in casebooks. The leading national and California-specific wills and trusts casebooks both use Townshend v. Townshend, an 1848 Maryland case, to teach the doctrine of "insane delusion." Townshend was the first U.S. case to use the doctrine to invalidate a will, but neither casebook includes a crucial fact: that John Townshend's "insane delusion" was that the salvation of his soul required emancipating the more than fifty enslaved people he owned at his death. The essay argues that if this case is used at all (and it need not be), this fuller context should be made clear, and ideally, this case should be taught alongside an 1840 Kentucky case, In re Weir's Will, which reached the opposite conclusion on very similar facts.

Keywords: slavery, wills and trusts, insane delusion, emancipation, manumission

Suggested Citation

Kemker, Diane, Almost Citing Slavery: Townshend v. Townshend in Wills and Trusts Casebooks (October 6, 2022). University of Pittsburgh Law Review, Forthcoming, Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=4240100 or http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.4240100

Diane Kemker (Contact Author)

Southern University Law Center ( email )

Roosevelt Steptoe Dr
Baton Rouge, LA 70813
United States

Do you have negative results from your research you’d like to share?

Paper statistics

Downloads
70
Abstract Views
348
Rank
580,052
PlumX Metrics