Fulton County Special Purpose Grand Jury v. Lindsey Graham, Amicus Curiae Brief of Separation of Powers Clinic in Support of Defendant-Appellant Senator Lindsey O. Graham

23 Pages Posted: 13 Oct 2022 Last revised: 27 Jan 2024

See all articles by R. Trent McCotter

R. Trent McCotter

George Mason University - Antonin Scalia Law School

Jamieson Knopf

George Mason University, Antonin Scalia Law School

Date Written: October 12, 2022

Abstract

This case is important to amicus because it addresses a constitutional protection ensuring the independence of the Congress from other branches and outside parties. The Supreme Court has expressly held that the Speech and Debate Clause preserves separation of powers by insulating legislators from executive and judicial inquisitions into putatively legislative actions, ensuring legislators have independence to make decisions as they see fit.

Applying the Supreme Court’s precedent in this area confirms that Senator Graham’s inquiries with Georgia officials, to inform and prepare himself for upcoming votes, are protected from subsequent inquisition.

Keywords: Separation of Powers, Constitutional Law, Congress, Speech and Debate Clause

JEL Classification: H1, H10, H11

Suggested Citation

McCotter, R. Trent and Knopf, Jamieson, Fulton County Special Purpose Grand Jury v. Lindsey Graham, Amicus Curiae Brief of Separation of Powers Clinic in Support of Defendant-Appellant Senator Lindsey O. Graham (October 12, 2022). Gray Center Separation of Powers Brief 11, 2022, Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=4246008

R. Trent McCotter (Contact Author)

George Mason University - Antonin Scalia Law School ( email )

3301 Fairfax Drive
Arlington, VA 22201
United States

Jamieson Knopf

George Mason University, Antonin Scalia Law School ( email )

3301 Fairfax Drive
Arlington, VA 22201
United States

Do you have a job opening that you would like to promote on SSRN?

Paper statistics

Downloads
33
Abstract Views
476
PlumX Metrics