Heritage Listing as a Tool for Advocacy: The Possibilities for Dissent, Contestation and Emancipation in International Law through International Cultural Heritage Law

5(2) Asian Journal of International Law 387-409 (2015)

24 Pages Posted: 23 Oct 2022

See all articles by Lucas Lixinski

Lucas Lixinski

University of New South Wales (UNSW)

Date Written: October 20, 2015

Abstract

This article discusses the possible uses of heritage listing under UNESCO for the promotion of broader political and social agendas by minority groups. The article uses as a case study the “Buddhist Chanting of Ladakh: recitation of sacred Buddhist texts in the trans-Himalayan Ladakh region, Jammu and Kashmir, India”. This heritage showcases issues of Tibetan autonomy (both within India and more broadly), relationships between Tibetan and Muslim cultures, and regional autonomy and accommodation of cultural minorities in the Indian State. There are many uses of listing Ladakhi heritage, ranging from listing as a means for autonomy of the Ladakhi, to listing as an instrument of domination, or even geographical control. I argue that heritage listing is not as “apolitical” as normally thought of, and it can be used as a mechanism to both benefit or harm minority groups and the advocacy of their claims within or against the territorial state.

Keywords: cultural heritage, self-determination, listing, Ladakh, Tibet

Suggested Citation

Lixinski, Lucas, Heritage Listing as a Tool for Advocacy: The Possibilities for Dissent, Contestation and Emancipation in International Law through International Cultural Heritage Law (October 20, 2015). 5(2) Asian Journal of International Law 387-409 (2015), Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=4253232 or http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.4253232

Lucas Lixinski (Contact Author)

University of New South Wales (UNSW) ( email )

Kensington
High St
Sydney, NSW 2052
Australia

Do you have a job opening that you would like to promote on SSRN?

Paper statistics

Downloads
49
Abstract Views
283
PlumX Metrics